- atrazinePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrilePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Triticum aestivumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- glyphosateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- FlumetsulamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- adjuvantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mesotrioneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- metolachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tembotrioneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tolpyralateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- rotationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.