cold · Nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)

Positive and negative results10 papers: 1 positive, 9 negative or no effect

12 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect197519801985199019952000200520102015
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 1

  1. Alternative Respiratory Path Capacity in Plant Mitochondria: Effect of Growth Temperature, the Electrochemical Gradient, and Assay pH · 1986

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 9

  1. ION TRANSPORT AND ENDODERMAL SUBERIZATION IN THE ROOTS OF ZEA MAYS · 1975

  2. Response of Corn to Zn in Ortho‐ and Pyrophosphate Fertilizers, as Affected by Soil Temperature and Moisture1 · 1978

  3. Action potentials in maize sieve tubes change phloem translocation · 1994

  4. Chilling‐induced Ca2+ overload enhances production of active oxygen species in maize (Zea mays L.) cultured cells: the effect of abscisic acid treatment · 2001

  5. Sensitivity of Mineral Concentration to Frost and Harvest Date in Silage Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2004

  6. Importance of plant species and external silicon concentration to active silicon uptake and transport · 2006

  7. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza on Growth and Nutrition of Maize Plants under Low Temperature Stress · 2016

  8. In vitro degradation and methane production of short-season corn hybrids harvested before or after a light frost · 2019

  9. Frost damage to maize in northeast India: assessment and estimated loss of yield by hyperspectral proximal remote sensing · 2019

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

cold on Zea mays (maize) against other targets

cold · nutrient: content on other organisms