- nitrapyrinPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Glycine maxPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- EC 3.5.1.5 (urease) inhibitorPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- cyanoguanidinePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Urochloa brizanthaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Vicia fabaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Azospirillum brasilenseResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrification inhibitorResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ammonium sulfateResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Zea mays subsp. maysResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassium chlorideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- diammonium hydrogen phosphateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Arachis hypogaeaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Brassica rapa subsp. rapaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- Burkholderia cepaciaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Paraburkholderia nodosaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ammoniaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorophyllResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pyraclostrobinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults differ189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- nitrogenPositive and negative results194 papers: 142 positive, 52 negative or no effect
- phosphorusPositive and negative results34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- otherPositive and negative results32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- intercroppingPositive and negative results22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- organicPositive and negative results16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- mulchingPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- potassiumPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- rotationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- cover cropPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- limeResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- stageResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cultivation systemResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- floodingResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- rainfallResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.