Quality: phytochemicals · Zea mays (maize)

1. salicylic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. selenium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. LactobacillusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. VolicitinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. copper atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. jasmonic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. prolineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. sedaxaneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. sucroseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. trehaloseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. zinc oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. applicationResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. biocharResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. coldResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.