application · Yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)

Positive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect198019851990199520002005201020152020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 3

  1. Influence of BOH (Beta-hydroxyethylhydrazine) on Pineapple cv Mauritius Grown in Malaysian Peat · 1978

  2. Effect of foliar spray of diazotrophic bacteria on the growth and yield of fruit plants · 1997

  3. Pineapple growth and yield response to fertilizer and drip irrigation management · 2017

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2

  1. Effects of Foliar Spraying Mg,Fe,Zn on the Growth and Yield of Pineapple · 2012

  2. Effect of foliar iron sulfate on the fruit growth and quality of pineapple (Ananas comosus cv. Yellow Mauritius) planted in lateritic soil in Leizhou Peninsula · 2021

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Ananas comosus (pineapple) against other targets

application · yield on other organisms