- ethenePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- Serendipita indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- dibenziodoliumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- coldPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- heatPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- loss of functionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- infectionResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salinityResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- overexpressionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.