herbicide · Pest · Musa

Positive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect20052010201520202025
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 3

  1. Effectiveness of weeding and bunch covering in controlling banana leaf and fruit beetle, Nodostoma viridipennis mots · 2004

  2. Weed Density and Diversity under Two Weed Management Practices in Sloping Lands of Banana Plantation in Davao City, Philippines · 2019

  3. The effect of weed control strategies on Meloidogyne spp. Göldi, 1897 (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) and Helicotylenchus spp. Steiner, 1945 (Tylenchida: Hoplolaimidae) in banana under water stress · 2025

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Use of hebicides for control of banana bacterial wilt in Uganda · 2007

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

herbicide on Musa against other targets

herbicide · pest on other organisms