Pest · Musa

37 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. Beauveria bassianaPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. Radopholus similisPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  3. Fusarium oxysporumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. poly(ethylene)Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. N-benzyladenineResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. azadirachtinResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. chlorpyrifosResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. Azadirachta indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. ThidiazuronResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. Dactylosternum abdominaleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Metarhizium anisopliaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. aminopurineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. benzyl groupResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. carbarylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. charcoalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. citric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. indole-3-butyric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. poly(propylene)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. in vitroPositive and negative results11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  22. applicationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. botanicalPositive and negative results9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  24. inoculationPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. fertilizationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  26. mulchingPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. herbicidePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  28. organicPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  31. storagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  32. biocontrolResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. trap barrierResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. pathogen productResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. sanitationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.