Physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Musa

1. salicylic acidResults differ4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. sodium disulfiteResults differ3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
3. spermidineResults differ2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
4. chitosanResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. glycine betaineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. inoculationPositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
13. coldPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. infectionResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. processingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. droughtResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. physical treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.