Stromatinia cepivora · Allium cepa (onion)

1. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Brassica oleracea var. italicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Trichoderma koningiiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Trichoderma virideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. dimercury dichlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. iprodioneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. fungicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. transplantingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. pathogen productResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.