- 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrilePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Maleic hydrazidePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- OxyfluorfenResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbofuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- flumioxazinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- indole-3-acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- malathionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- mancozebResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- metolachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pendimethalinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- streptomycinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocontrolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- herbicideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fungicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.