Molecular: metabolites · Allium sativum (garlic)

35 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. sulfur atomPositive and negative results14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. Gibberellic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. selenium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. boraxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. cadmium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  9. colchicineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. radiationResults differ9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  13. processingPositive and negative results26 papers: 13 positive, 13 negative or no effect
  14. fertilizationPositive and negative results20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  15. coldPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  16. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  17. heatPositive and negative results9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  18. lightPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. cultivation systemPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. nitrogenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. uvPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. botanicalResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. droughtResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. herbicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.