- sulfur atomPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- selenium atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- cadmium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- sodium chloridePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.