herbicide · Yield · ×Triticosecale (triticale)
13 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 7
- positive
- positive
- positive
Yielding of Winter Triticale Varieties in Different Protection Levels in Two Sequence Systems · 2016
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION, NITROGEN AND WEEDING ON YIELD COMPONENTS AND STRAW YIELD OF TRITICALE · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) Response to Herbicides · 1994
- no effect
- no effect
Evaluation of the effectiveness of different herbicides on weed invasion in the fields of triticale · 2012
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.