Nutrient: content · Gladiolus

1. silicon atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. sucroseResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. AzotobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. nitrogenResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.