Growth · Cyperus rotundus

1. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. 2,4-DResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Halosulfuron-methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. glyphosateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. EPTCResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. pruningPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. mulchingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. botanicalResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. heatResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.