- RhizobiumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silver nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- radiationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salinityPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- stagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- coldPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- uvResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.