Yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)

1. Daucus carotaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. sodium carbonatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. RhizobiumResults agree34 papers: 34 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. zinc atomResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. pendimethalinResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. sulfur atomResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Gibberellic acidResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. ImazethapyrResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. thioureaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. AzotobacterResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. FluchloralinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. Trichoderma virideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. molybdenum atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. silver nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. thiamethoxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. fertilizationPositive and negative results60 papers: 59 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. inoculationPositive and negative results41 papers: 38 positive, 3 negative or no effect
24. applicationPositive and negative results31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. nitrogenPositive and negative results24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. herbicidePositive and negative results16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect
27. irrigationPositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
28. droughtPositive and negative results8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect
29. sowing timePositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
30. botanicalPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. intercroppingPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
32. salinityPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
33. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
34. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
35. phosphorusResults agree35 papers: 35 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. densityResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. classResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. pruningResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. seed treatmentResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. otherResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. biocharResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. rotationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. organicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
45. growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
46. micronutrientResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
47. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
48. radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
49. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
50. transgenicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.