- propanilPositive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- adjuvantPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- butachlorPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- Cyhalofop-butylPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- ImazethapyrPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- glyphosatePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- OxadiazonPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- SethoxydimPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- acifluorfenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- ammonium sulfatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- glufosinateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- topramezoneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- herbicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.