View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: crop ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
A similar reduction of plant-available P would decrease crop yield by 8%.
Treatmentreduction of plant-available P e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e7 “a similar reduction of plant-available P would lead to a decrease in crop yield by 8% with an in crease in P response efficiency by 83% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1411 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
A 50% reduction of plant-available N would decrease crop yield by 17%.
Treatmentreduction of plant-available N by 50% e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “a reduction of plant-available N by 50% would lead to a decrease in crop yield by 17% and a concomitant in crease in N response efficiency by 67% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1267 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Crop model simulations in dicate a 2xCO2 climate would decrease the yield and its stability to a marked extent in south-central and south-western Japan.
Outcomethe yield and its stability e0 Settingsouth-central and south-western Japan e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a 2xCO2 climate would substantially in crease crop yield and its stability in northern and north-central Japan, and that, in south-central and south-western Japan, it will decrease the yield and its stability to a marked extent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–715 Other claims from this paper (6) Association author interpretation review summary projected Claim · model-written summary
Maximum and minimum temperature in creases are projected to cause a substantial crop yield decrease in low latitude areas.
Treatmentmaximum and minimum temperatures increasing e0 Settinglow latitude areas e0 Verbatim
e0 “maximum and minimum temperatures in creasing causing substantial yield decrease in low latitude areas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–669 e4 “This paper provides comprehensive review studies on the impacts of climate change on crop and water productivity, soil water balance and food security ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–274 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Temperatures above 26.1 °C can sharply decrease crop yields.
TreatmentRising temperatures e0 Verbatim
e0 “Rising temperatures to more than 26.1 °C can cause a sharp decrease in crop yields ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–972 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–63 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water quality did not decrease simulated crop growth over one season.
TreatmentIrrigation water quality e0 Directionnot effective in decreasing e0 Verbatim
e0 “Irrigation water quality was not effective in decreasing crop growth in one season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1303 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Thresholds caused sharp decrease s or in creases in crop yields.
Directiondecrease or increase e0 Verbatim
e0 “Thresholds lead to a sharp decrease or in crease in crop yields ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1177 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Management decrease d nitrate leaching by 16%.
TreatmentIntegrated site-specific management e1 Outcomenitrate leaching e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a 16% decrease in nitrate leaching ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1712 e1 “In tegrated site-specific management ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1145 t0 “crop residue ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect author interpretation review summary positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Nanostructured materials decrease nutrient loss relative to conventional fertilizers.
Treatmentnanostructured materials e1 Comparatorconventional fertilizers e1 Verbatim
t0 “sustainable crop production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–43 e1 “These nanostructured materials are more effective in releasing nutrients in a site-specific manner, in creasing plant uptake efficiency and decreasing nutrient loss, and targeting specific pests than conventional fertilizers and pesticides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–973 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each degree Celsius of winter soil warming was associated with a 6.6 ( ± 1.7) g kg-1 decrease in straw biomass carbon.
Treatmentwinter soil temperature e0 Value6.6 ( ± 1.7) g kg-1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “For every degree Celsius in crease in winter soil temperature, straw and grain biomass carbon decrease d by 6.6 ( ± 1.7) g kg-1 and 10.2 ( ± 2.3) g kg-1, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–577 t0 “crop biomass carbon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–53 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.