View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W4404650897 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Central pruning produced lighter kernels.
TreatmentCentral pruning e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Central pruning resulted in lighter and yellowish kernels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1188 t0 “pecan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Central pruning produced yellowish kernels.
TreatmentCentral pruning e0 Outcomeyellowish kernels e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Central pruning resulted in lighter and yellowish kernels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1188 t0 “pecan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest pruning produced heavier fruit.
Treatmentpostharvest pruning e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Fruit borne by trees that were subject to postharvest pruning got heavier ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1057 t0 “pecan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Pruning in creased production in the second cycle.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Production and production efficiency just in creased after pruning in the second cycle. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–983 t0 “pecan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest pruning reduced shoot vigor and shoot growth.
TreatmentPostharvest pruning e0 Outcomevigor and, consequently, shoot growth e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Postharvest pruning decrease d vigor and, consequently, shoot growth. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–761 t0 “pecan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Pruning in creased production efficiency in the second cycle.
Outcomeproduction efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Production and production efficiency just in creased after pruning in the second cycle. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–983 t0 “pecan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Central pruning produced larger fruit.
Treatmentcentral pruning e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “only the ones borne by trees subject to central pruning got larger ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1128 e1 “Fruit borne by trees that were subject to postharvest pruning got heavier ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1057 t0 “pecan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Hedge pruning did not mitigate dry branches.
Directiondid not mitigate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “hedge pruning did not mitigate the problem ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–895 e1 “The number of dry branches decrease d after central pruning in both pruning periods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–844 t0 “pecan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Central pruning reduced the number of dry branches in both pruning periods.
Treatmentcentral pruning e0 Outcomenumber of dry branches e0 Qualifierboth pruning periods e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The number of dry branches decrease d after central pruning in both pruning periods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–844 t0 “pecan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.