Claim · model-written summary
Green manure did not decrease subsequent wheat season soil water content and storage in the first two years.
Triticum aestivumVerbatim
e0“GM did not decrease the soil water content and storage (0–200 cm layer) during the subsequent winter wheat season, relative to BL”
Title
Xiushuang Li; Juan Chen; Jianglan Shi; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14162476
Other claims from this paper (18)
- Intervention effect Green manure raised winter wheat grain yield by 3.2% in year three.
- Intervention effect Green manure raised winter wheat grain yield by 3.8% in year four.
- Intervention effect B increased winter wheat grain yield by 14.4% in year three.
- Intervention effect BS increased winter wheat grain yield by 22.2% in year three.
- Intervention effect B increased winter wheat grain yield by 12.7% in year four.
- Intervention effect BS increased winter wheat grain yield by 19.4% in year four.
- Mechanism Yield increases arose primarily through increased wheat population density.
- Mechanism Higher grain yield contributed to higher wheat water use efficiency.
- Intervention effect In year three, GM increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 2.4%.
- Intervention effect In year three, GM increased wheat WUE by 1.7%.
- Intervention effect In year three, B increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 8.3%.
- Intervention effect In year three, B increased wheat WUE by 5.6%.
- Intervention effect In year three, BS increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 10.4%.
- Intervention effect In year three, BS increased wheat WUE by 10.7%.
- Intervention effect Basal fertilizer and basal fertilizer with straw produced higher yield and nitrogen nutrition than green manure alone.
- Intervention effect Green manure with basal fertilizer and straw achieved the highest yield and nitrogen nutrition.
- Intervention effect Green manure combined with fertilization decreased nitrogen uptake efficiency.
- Intervention effect Green manure combined with fertilization increased nitrogen productivity.