Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: corn ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet pack density of corn silage tended to decrease as maturity advanced.

Treatment
maturitye0
Outcome
wet pack densitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
in all of the pack-density experimentse0

Verbatim

e0

“The wet pack density of corn silage tended to decrease as maturity advanced in all of the pack-density experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–446

Title

Corn Silage Management: Effects of Maturity, Inoculation, and Mechanical Processing on Pack Density and Aerobic Stability

L.M. Johnson; J.H. Harrison; D. Davidson; et al. Journal of Dairy Science 2002. doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74092-7

Other claims from this paper (4)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in bald tip exceeded the decrease in ear length and width at higher density.

Treatment
Increased planting densitye1
Outcome
bald tipe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
larger than the decrease of ear length and widthe0

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of bald tip was larger than the decrease of ear length and width.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1101
e1

“Increased planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–939
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35

Title

Responses of ear characters of corn with uneven plant height to planting density

MA Rui-kun Hebei Nongye Daxue xuebao 2008

Other claims from this paper (10)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide use may increase or decrease depending on field pest density.

Outcome
insecticide usee0
Direction
increase or decreasee0
Qualifier
pest densities on individual fieldse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on pest densities on individual fields, insecticide use may increase or decrease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–657
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70

Title

Insecticide Use and Crop Rotation under Risk: Rootworm Control in Corn

William F. Lazarus; Earl R. Swanson American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1983. doi:10.2307/1240462

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn plant mass tended to decrease as plant density of silage corn rose from 50 to 100 thousand plants per hectare across all hybrid maturity groups.

Treatment
increasing plant densitye1
Outcome
plant masse1
Direction
tended to decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Corn productivity for silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28
e1

“the corn plant mass tended to decrease with increasing plant density of the silage corn from 50 to 100 thousand plants per hectare across all the maturity groups of the hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1186

Title

Corn productivity for silage depending on plant density in the conditions of the Northern Steppe of Ukraine

I. O. Kanibolotskyi; Y. I. Tkalich; O. I. Tsyliuryk; et al. Agrology 2025. doi:10.32819/202417

Other claims from this paper (19)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher plant density was associated with lower leaf number.

Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
leaf numbere0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in plant density was accompanied by a decrease in leaf number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–196
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95

Title

EFFECTS OF PLANT DENSITY AND PLANTING DATE ON LEAF NUMBER AND SOME DEVELOPMENTAL EVENTS IN CORN

E. E. N. A. BONAPARTE; R. I. BRAWN Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1976. doi:10.4141/cjps76-109

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density decreased grains per ear.

Outcome
grains per eare0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decrease of grains per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–1993
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112

Title

The effect of source-sink restriction and plant density changes on the role of assimilate remobilization in corn grain yield.

Fatemeh Falihzade; Mani Mojadam; Shahram Lack International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences (IJACS) 2013

Other claims from this paper (15)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in bulk density with gypsum is attributed to a greater increase in porosity relative to 1,000-grain weight.

Outcome
bulk densitye3
Qualifier
a greater increase in porosity in relation to weight of 1,000 grainse3

Verbatim

e2

“corn irrigated with increasing doses of gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–505
e3

“the decrease in bulk density in function of the increase of gypsum doses is attributed to a greater increase in porosity in relation to weight of 1,000 grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1491

Title

Productivity and physical properties of corn grains treated with different gypsum doses

Marques Vidal Vitor; Antonio Loureiro Soares Frederico; Batista Teixeira Marconi; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2016. doi:10.5897/ajar2016.11468

Other claims from this paper (2)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Production values decreased as planting density increased.

Treatment
densitiese0
Outcome
values of productione0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35
e0

“With the increase in densities, there was decrease in the values of production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1432

Title

PRODUCTION INDICATORS OF GREEN CORN CULTIVARS AT DIFFERENT POPULATION DENSITIES

FRANCINEUMA PONCIANO DE ARRUDA; MICHAELLY HEIDY MORAES MATOS; ANTONIO LEONÍCIO FERREIRA DA CRUZ; et al. Revista Caatinga 2022. doi:10.1590/1983-21252022v35n209rc

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150% more than optimum density decreased weed density by 27.5%

Treatment
150% more than optimum densitye0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
27.5%e0
Comparator
50%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Increase of density of mungbean from 50% into 150% more than optimum density, decrease the density and dry weight of weeds, 27.5% and 22%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1306
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–101

Title

Effect of mungbean (Vigna radiate) living mulch on density and dry weight of weeds in corn (Zea mays) field.

M Bakhtiari Moghadam; S Vazan; B Darvishi; et al. PubMed 2011

Other claims from this paper (7)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density decreased ear grain number mainly through fewer grains per row.

Treatment
Increased planting densitye0
Outcome
ear grain numbere0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
reduced grain number per rowe0

Verbatim

e0

“Increased planting density led to decrease in ear grain number due mainly to reduced grain number per row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1018
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35

Title

Responses of ear characters of corn with uneven plant height to planting density

MA Rui-kun Hebei Nongye Daxue xuebao 2008

Other claims from this paper (10)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.