Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences (IJACS)

The effect of source-sink restriction and plant density changes on the role of assimilate remobilization in corn grain yield.

Fatemeh Falihzade; Mani Mojadam; Shahram Lack

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the effect of source-sink restriction and various plant density on the remobilization of assimilates stored in vegetative parts to the ear corn hybrid single cross 704, a split-block experiment as randomized complete block design with three replications was carried out in Ahvaz in summer 2011. In this research the source restriction was imposed through defoliation of the leaves and the sink restriction was imposed by cutting theear at the end of pollination stage as the main factor including the defoliation of the upper leaves of the corn, defoliation of lower leaves, removal of 50% of the ear, and no defoliation and no ear removal (control) in main plots and the plant density as the sub factor including 60000 plants per hectare, 75000 plants per hectare (control) and 90000 plants per hectare in sub plots. Results indicated that source-sink restriction and plant density had significant effect on the rate, contribution, and efficiency of photosynthesis and assimilates remobilization. The highest grain yield by 868.67 g/m 2 belonged to the control treatment (no defoliation or ear removal)due to producing more grains and the heavier weight of 1000-grain and the lowest grain yield by 646.33 g/m 2 belonged to the treatment with the removal of 50% of ear due to significant decrease of grains in the corn and the number of grains per square meter in spite of the increase of the weight of 1000-grain. The treatment with 50% removal of ear had the lowest rate and contribution of remobilization (9.9%) because of the sink restriction, but the treatment with the defoliation of the upper leaves of the ear had the highest rate and contribution of remobilization (39.31%) due to significant decrease of rate and contribution of photosynthesis (60.69%).In this experiment, the increase of plant density increased the grain yield significantly because of the increase of the grains per square meter and the weight of 1000-grain despite the decrease of grains per ear so that the density of 90000 plants per hectare had the highest grain yield by 886.33 g/m 2 . This treatment devoted the least contribution of photosynthesis (71.74%) and the most contribution of remobilization (28.26%) in the production of grain yield to itself due to close competition among the plants especially further shadowing of the leaves. The interactive effect of the factors showed that the treatment with the defoliation of upper leaves of the ear and with density of 90000 plants per hectare had the highest contribution of remobilization (43.37%) and the lowest contribution of photosynthesis (56.63%) in grain weight which indicated that the decreasing effect of removal of the upper leaves of the ear and the increase of plant density on photosynthesis through the decrease of leaf area and the increase of leaves shadowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Source-sink restriction and density significantly affected photosynthesis and assimilate remobilization rate, contribution and efficiency.

Treatment
source-sink restriction and plant densitye0
Outcome
rate, contribution, and efficiency of photosynthesis and assimilates remobilizatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“source-sink restriction and plant density had significant effect on the rate, contribution, and efficiency of photosynthesis and assimilates remobilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1014 · show in text ↑
e1

“ear corn hybrid single cross 704”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–185 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The untreated control had the highest grain yield, 868.67 g/m 2.

Treatment
no defoliation or ear removale0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
868.67 g/m 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield by 868.67 g/m 2 belonged to the control treatment (no defoliation or ear removal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing 50% of the ear gave the lowest grain yield, 646.33 g/m 2.

Treatment
removal of 50% of eare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
646.33 g/m 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest grain yield by 646.33 g/m 2 belonged to the treatment with the removal of 50% of ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing 50% of the ear significantly decreased grain numbers but increased 1000-grain weight.

Treatment
removal of 50% of eare0
Outcome
grains in the corn and the number of grains per square metere0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“removal of 50% of ear due to significant decrease of grains in the corn and the number of grains per square meter in spite of the increase of the weight of 1000-grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing 50% of the ear increased 1000-grain weight.

Treatment
removal of 50% of eare0
Outcome
weight of 1000-graine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“removal of 50% of ear due to significant decrease of grains in the corn and the number of grains per square meter in spite of the increase of the weight of 1000-grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1431 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear removal produced the lowest remobilization rate and contribution, 9.9%.

Treatment
50% removal of eare0
Outcome
rate and contribution of remobilizatione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
9.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with 50% removal of ear had the lowest rate and contribution of remobilization (9.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1532 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliating upper leaves produced the highest remobilization rate and contribution, 39.31%.

Treatment
defoliation of the upper leaves of the eare0
Outcome
rate and contribution of remobilizatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
39.31%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“defoliation of the upper leaves of the ear had the highest rate and contribution of remobilization (39.31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1700 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-leaf defoliation significantly decreased photosynthesis contribution to 60.69%.

Outcome
rate and contribution of photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
60.69%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant decrease of rate and contribution of photosynthesis (60.69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1780 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density significantly increased grain yield.

Treatment
increase of plant densitye0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of plant density increased the grain yield significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–1870 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density increased grains per square meter and 1000-grain weight.

Outcome
grains per square meter and the weight of 1000-graine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of the grains per square meter and the weight of 1000-grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1954 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density decreased grains per ear.

Outcome
grains per eare0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease of grains per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–1993 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90000 plants per hectare, grain yield was highest at 886.33 g/m 2.

Treatment
90000 plants per hectaree0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
886.33 g/m 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“density of 90000 plants per hectare had the highest grain yield by 886.33 g/m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2085 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90000 plants per hectare, photosynthesis contribution was lowest at 71.74%.

Outcome
contribution of photosynthesise0
Direction
leaste0
Value
71.74%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“least contribution of photosynthesis (71.74%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2115–2160 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90000 plants per hectare, remobilization contribution was highest at 28.26%.

Outcome
contribution of remobilizatione0
Direction
moste0
Value
28.26%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most contribution of remobilization (28.26%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2169–2213 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-leaf defoliation at 90000 plants per hectare gave the highest remobilization contribution, 43.37%.

Treatment
defoliation of upper leaves of the ear and with density of 90000 plants per hectaree0
Outcome
contribution of remobilizatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
43.37%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“defoliation of upper leaves of the ear and with density of 90000 plants per hectare had the highest contribution of remobilization (43.37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2416–2555 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-leaf defoliation at 90000 plants per hectare gave the lowest photosynthesis contribution, 56.63%.

Outcome
contribution of photosynthesise0
Direction
loweste0
Value
56.63%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest contribution of photosynthesis (56.63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2564–2610 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.