View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed production did not differ significantly among the pollinator agents.
not significantly different e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Seed production and seed viability were not significantly different in fruit from flowers pollinated by these agents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–297 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed viability did not differ significantly among the pollinator agents.
not significantly different e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Seed production and seed viability were not significantly different in fruit from flowers pollinated by these agents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–297 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant differences were found between nematode progeny from banana and from citrus.
Alchennachkommenschaften e6 Verbatim
e6 “Keine bedeutenden Unterschiede wurden zwischen der Alchennachkommenschaften von Banane und Citrus gefunden ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–981 e7 “Bananenwurzeln (Musa nana Lour.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–767 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation Inoculation of citrus seedlings with single female Radopholus similis succeeded in 3 of 40 trials. Observation Three months after citrus inoculation, 6, 6 and 5 female nematodes were recovered. Observation Maize inoculated with single female R. similis succeeded in 10 of 22 trials. Observation Two months after inoculation, up to 477 R. similis were recovered on one maize plant. Observation Maize inoculated with single female R. similis from banana roots succeeded in 7 of 10 trials. Observation Two months after inoculation, maize plants carried 2 to 187 nematodes. Observation Progeny of individual female R. similis vary greatly. Observation Stylet length of females and vulva position, as percent of body length, are valuable characters. Observation Total body length, body width and anal width of R. similis are very variable. Observation Ratios a, b and c of R. similis are variable, but to a lesser degree than body length, body width and anal width. Observation Females of one progeny varied in head size, head ring number and excretory pore position. Observation Females of one progeny varied in vulval lip protrusion, gonad form and size, and tail shape. Observation Males differed greatly in head form and size, head ring number and stylet development. Observation Males differed greatly in excretory pore position and tail shape. Observation Spicula and gubernaculum of males were fairly constant in form and size. Observation In one female progeny, a male appeared that resembled a fourth-stage larva. Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematodes from potato, bulbous iris and dahlia showed no significant difference in basic structures, indicating one species.
basic structures e1 any significant difference e1 Verbatim
t0 “FROM POTATO, BULBOUS IRIS, AND DAHLIA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–118 e1 “Nematodes having the general characters of Ditylenchus destructor Thorne, 1945, from the potato, bulbous iris, and dahlia, did not reveal any significant difference in the basic structures to suggest the presence of more than one species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–237 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Species shade tolerance differences were not significantly correlated with the magnitude of mass-based respiration change.
magnitude of either ΔRd mass e0 shade tolerance differences e0 Not reported Treatment Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Species shade tolerance differences were not significantly correlated with the magnitude of either ΔRd mass or ΔRd area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2236–2355 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Species shade tolerance differences were not significantly correlated with the magnitude of area-based respiration change.
shade tolerance differences e0 Not reported Treatment Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Species shade tolerance differences were not significantly correlated with the magnitude of either ΔRd mass or ΔRd area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2236–2355 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Correlations between awn divergence and length, rhizomes and culm number, and diameter and culm number were inconsistent or nonsignificant across populations.
Agropyron spicatum e1 correlations between awn divergence and length, rhizomes with number of culms, adn diameter with number of culms e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “correlations between awn divergence and length, rhizomes with number of culms, adn diameter with number of culms were inconsistent or not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–564 e1 “Agropyron spicatum (Pursh) Scribn, and Smith ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Individuals with different chromosome numbers showed no significant gross-morphology differences.
gross morphology e1 No significant differences e1 cytologically diverse individuals e1 Verbatim
e0 “From a restricted range in eastern Texas three chromosome numbers for Claytonia virginica L. are reported. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 e1 “No significant differences in gross morphology or pollen grain size were noted between these cytologically diverse individuals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–336 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Individuals with different chromosome numbers showed no significant pollen-size differences.
pollen grain e1 pollen grain size e1 No significant differences e1 cytologically diverse individuals e1 Verbatim
e0 “From a restricted range in eastern Texas three chromosome numbers for Claytonia virginica L. are reported. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 e1 “No significant differences in gross morphology or pollen grain size were noted between these cytologically diverse individuals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–336 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Bulbous buttercup showed no significant response to grazing treatments.
differential grazing treatments e0 no significant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Bulbous buttercup and rough‐stalked meadow grass showed no significant response to differential grazing treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1201 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Musa acuminata
Solanum tuberosum
Claytonia virginica