View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Remnant tree number strongly shaped forest recovery rates .
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Recovery rates are strongly shaped by both the number of remnant trees (residuals of the former old- growth forest) and the previous crop cultivated before abandonment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1305 e1 “time needed to recover 50% of an old- growth forest biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1409 t0 “forested ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
The previously cultivated crop strongly shaped forest recovery rates .
Treatmentprevious crop cultivated before abandonment e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Recovery rates are strongly shaped by both the number of remnant trees (residuals of the former old- growth forest) and the previous crop cultivated before abandonment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1305 e1 “time needed to recover 50% of an old- growth forest biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1409 t0 “forested ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Species differed significantly in post-fire growth rates .
TaxonFlorida Scrub Vegetation t0 Outcomepost-fire growth rates e0 Qualifierdiffering recovery modes e0 Verbatim
e0 “species varied significantly in their post-fire growth rates , especially between those with differing recovery modes. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1033 t0 “Florida Scrub Vegetation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–67 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
In sensitivity analyses, utilisation rates and degradation and recovery periods were most important for grassland zones.
Outcomeutilisation rates and degradation and recovery periods e0 Directionmost important e0 Verbatim
e0 “utilisation rates and degradation and recovery periods were most important for grassland zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1370 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Secondary growth rates of 1.41–2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1 indicate recovery times of about 69 to 97 years to reach average control aboveground biomass (137 ± 12.3 Mg ha−1).
Taxonsecondary montane forests t0 Qualifier1.41–2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1 for DBH ≥ 10 cm e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “secondary montane forests in Peru ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–56 e2 “Secondary growth rates (1.41–2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1 for DBH ≥ 10 cm) indicate recovery times of ca. 69 to 97 years to reach average control AGB values (137 ± 12.3 Mg ha−1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1356 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree growth rates did not differ among treatments.
Outcometree growth rates e0 Directiondid not differ e0 Verbatim
e0 “tree growth rates did not differ among treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–752 e1 “Ligustrum sinense Lour. (Chinese privet) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–398 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Low secondary dispersal, within-population kin structure, and slow growth appeared to contribute to slow genetic diversity recovery .
Outcomeslow recovery of genetic diversity e0 QualifierLow rates of secondary dispersal via running water, kin-structure within populations, and slow population growth e0 Verbatim
e0 “Low rates of secondary dispersal via running water, kin-structure within populations, and slow population growth seem to contribute to the slow recovery of genetic diversity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1319 t0 “Nassauvia lagascae var. lanata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher recruitment and faster vegetative growth appeared to explain faster meadow recovery .
Qualifierhigher recruitment and faster vegetative growth e0 Verbatim
e0 “Higher growth rates and faster recovery in meadow populations appear to be due to higher recruitment and faster vegetative growth . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1452 t0 “Nardostachys grandiflora ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–125 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative growth rates declined with woodrose size.
OutcomeRelative growth rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “Relative growth rates declined (negative In function) from very high rates for very small woodroses to fairly similar slow rates of growth for all other sizes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1565 t0 “Erianthemum dregei (Loranthaceae) on Sclerocarya birrea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–149 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
West African forest biomass recovers more slowly than Neotropical forest biomass.
ComparatorNeotropical forests e0 Verbatim
e0 “the very slow recovery rates of West African forests, as compared to Neotropical forests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1600 e1 “time needed to recover 50% of an old- growth forest biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1409 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.