View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Missing data caused only a minor decrease in selection coincidence.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “missing data only led to a minor decrease in coincidence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1371 t0 “Maize Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
CPD-YOLO generalization showed a 0.55 % mAP decrease .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the CPD-YOLO model had superior generalization capability, with a 1.30 % decrease in F1-score and a 0.55 % decrease in mAP. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1410 t0 “cotton pests and diseases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
YOLOv8n-RML shows a 34.5% decrease in GFLOPS for strawberry ripeness detection.
Verbatim
e0 “specifically tailored for strawberry harvesting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–126 e2 “The YOLOv8n-RML model demonstrates a 48.6% reduction in parameters and a 34.5% decrease in GFLOPS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1099 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
CPD-YOLO generalization showed a 1.30 % F1-score decrease .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the CPD-YOLO model had superior generalization capability, with a 1.30 % decrease in F1-score and a 0.55 % decrease in mAP. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1410 t0 “cotton pests and diseases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yields.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yields as well as yield safety for the future. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yields as well as yield safety for the future. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
YOLOv5_E accuracy shows a 0.9% marginal decrease compared with the original YOLOv5.
marginal decrease e5 the original YOLOv5 e5 Verbatim
e0 “During pineapple cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–37 e5 “Compared to the original YOLOv5, YOLOv5_E shows a 0.9% marginal decrease in accuracy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1117 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The two approaches gave a higher decrease rate with fewer samples.
smaller quantities e0 Verbatim
e0 “Testing different amount of samples, the two approaches can provide higher decrease rate in smaller quantities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–920 t0 “Watermelon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–46 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Models with one and four augmentation techniques showed a decrease in performance.
one and four augmentation techniques e0 Verbatim
t0 “Tea Leaf Disease Classification ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–114 e0 “models with one and four augmentation techniques experience a decrease in performance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–974 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
All four models had a slight accuracy decrease on workstations and mobile devices.
workstation and mobile devices e0 Verbatim
e0 “the four models have a slight accuracy decrease on both workstation and mobile devices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–851 e1 “Mason model has a highest accuracy of 90.54% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–611 t0 “Plant Diseases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Gossypium hirsutum_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria
Ananas comosus
Citrullus lanatus