Claim · model-written summary
As forward speed rose, mean droplet density on the top fell from 277.35 - 243.40 no.cm-2.
Glycine maxVerbatim
e0“With an increase in forwarding speed, the mean percentage of coverage decreased significantly (30.30 - 15.37 % for top and 20.01- 4.12 % for bottom part of the leaves), and the mean droplet density varied significantly (277.35 - 243.40 no.cm-2 for top and 262.87 - 78.44 no.cm-2 for the bottom part of the leaves) at 5 % level of significance.”
t0“The spraying system was tested on soybean crop”
Title
Design and Performance Evaluation of Self-propelled Intra-Canopy Boom Spraying System
Bhabani Shankar Dash; Arun Kumar; Rajesh U. Modi; et al. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India) 2020. doi:10.52151/jae2020573.1715
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Method / resource Flat fan nozzles gave better boom volumetric distribution at 2.5 kgf.cm-2.
- Method / resource Hollow cone nozzles gave better distribution at 2.0 kgf.cm-2 and 300 mm height.
- Method / resource As forward speed rose, mean percentage of coverage on the top fell from 30.30 - 15.37 %.
- Method / resource As forward speed rose, mean percentage of coverage on the bottom part of the leaves fell from 20.01- 4.12 %.
- Method / resource As forward speed rose, mean droplet density on the bottom part of the leaves fell from 262.87 - 78.44 no.cm-2.
- Method / resource At 1.5 km.h-1, top leaf coverage was 30.30%.
- Method / resource At 1.5 km.h-1, bottom leaf coverage was 20.01%.
- Method / resource Low speed increased spray volume relative to faster travel.
- Method / resource Low speed reduced field capacity relative to faster travel.
- Method / resource Forward travel speed, tag position and nozzle type significantly affected mean droplet size.
- Method / resource Forward travel speed, tag position and nozzle type significantly affected number median diameter.
- Method / resource Forward travel speed, tag position and nozzle type significantly affected percentage coverage of leaf area.
- Method / resource Forward travel speed, tag position and nozzle type significantly affected droplet density.
- Method / resource Field capacity ranged from 0.22 to 0.36 ha.h-1 as travel speed increased from 1.50 to 2.50 km.h-1.