View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
YOLOV8s reached 121.5 FPS , faster than YOLOV5 at 102.7 FPS and Faster R-CNN at 11 FPS .
QualifierFaster R-CNN’s 11 FPS e0 Verbatim
e0 “The YOLOV8s model has a significantly superior frame rate, reaching 121.5 FPS , in contrast to YOLOV5’s 102.7 FPS and Faster R-CNN’s 11 FPS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1101 t0 “Tomato Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The pipeline reported 67.65 FPS for 67.65 FPS .
Verbatim
e0 “fast inference time (14.78 ms per image), and 67.65 FPS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–737 t0 “cut chrysanthemum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The frame rate was 43.92 FPS versus 51.02 FPS for the original model.
Comparatororiginal model e0 Verbatim
e0 “The frame rate remains at 43.92 FPS , approaching the original model’s 51.02 FPS . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1427 t0 “Walnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The detector ran at 154 FPS , outperforming rival detectors by 12–132 FPS .
Qualifieroutperforming rivals by 12–132 FPS e2 Verbatim
t0 “rice panicles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–117 e2 “a frame rate of 154 FPS (outperforming rivals by 12–132 FPS ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1595 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Inference speed rose from 30.36 FPS to 60.14 FPS .
Directionnearly doubles e0 Verbatim
e0 “nearly doubles inference speed from 30.36 FPS to 60.14 FPS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1448 t0 “tea shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
YOLOv8-VEW ran at 90 FPS , 24 FPS better than YOLOv8.
Verbatim
e0 “the F1, mAP, and FPS (frames per second) of the YOLOv8-VEW model were 0.95, 96.9%, and 90 FPS , respectively, which were 0.05, 2.4%, and 24 FPS better than those of the YOLOv8 model. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–873 t0 “Soybean Flower and Pod Detection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–44 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
On Nvidia Jetson Xavier NX, YOLOv8n-MCP achieved 49.5 FPS versus 37.6 FPS for YOLOv8n.
Comparatororiginal YOLOv8n e0 SettingNvidia Jetson Xavier NX e0 Verbatim
t0 “strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–46 e0 “Tests on Nvidia Jetson Xavier NX demonstrate that YOLOv8n-MCP achieves 49.5 FPS , significantly outperforming the original YOLOv8n’s 37.6 FPS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1265 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
FCHE-YOLO inference speed rose to 47.5 FPS from 43.3 FPS .
Verbatim
e0 “the inference speed of the model increases from 43.3 FPS to 47.5 FPS , with an increase of 9.0% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1443 t0 “tea leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–16 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The system processed 24.4 FPS .
Verbatim
e0 “41 ms per frame (24.4 FPS ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1337 t0 “orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The model achieved 303.1 FPS .
Verbatim
e0 “The model achieves 303.1 FPS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1276 t0 “Kiwifruit Flower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.