Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“quality of feed and precision indices”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 2 non-evaluative

Over time

2010 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerial imagery underestimated quality of feed and precision indices.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
Outcome: quality of feed and precision indicese0
Direction: underestimatede0
Comparator: Aerial imagery data sourcee0

Verbatim

e0
“Aerial imagery data source underestimated quality of feed and precision indices”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1225

t0
“Drone Imagery for Monitoring Performance of a Modified Drill”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–75

e1
“no-till corn planter”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–52

Title

Feasibility of Drone Imagery for Monitoring Performance of a Modified Drill in a Conservation Farming System\n\t\t\t\tدوره10 شماره1 سال1399

Kavoosi, Z; Raoufat, M. H Māshīn/hā-yi kishāvarzī/Māshīn/hā-yi kishāvarzī 1397 (?). doi:10.22067/jam.v10i1.71498

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource Images from 10 m altitude gave satisfactory planter assessment results.
Method / resource Aerial and terrestrial seedling spacing measurements correlated with R between 0.94 and 0.98.
Method / resource Aerial imagery overestimated miss index.
Method / resource Aerial imagery could not supply the data range needed to compute multiple index.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For corn, seed distance and planting depth significantly affected multiple, miss, quality of feed and precision indices.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: different distances between seeds and planting depthse0
Outcome: multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision indexe0
Direction: highere0
Value: P< 0.01e0

Verbatim

e0
“the different distances between seeds and planting depths were significantly higher for multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision index (P< 0.01)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3943–4111

t0
“corn and bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78

Title

Development and field evaluation of an intercropping machine for corn and bean

A Mondani; S. H Karparvarfard DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.22067/jam.v6i2.40405

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resource For bean, shorter seed distance increased the multiple index.
Method / resource For bean, greater planting depth decreased the multiple index.
Method / resource Bean seed distance and planting depth significantly affected the miss index and quality of feed index.
Method / resource Bean seed distance and planting depth significantly affected the precision index.
Method / resource The corn spacing by depth interaction was significant for multiple index.
Method / resource The corn spacing by depth interaction was not significant for the other planting indices.
Method / resource Corn planting at 160 mm seed distance and 60 mm depth gave the optimum quality index.
Method / resource Bean planting at 215 mm seed distance and 60 mm depth gave the optimum quality index.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanter accuracy indices were generally similar in tilled and no-till soils.

Taxon: vegetablet0
Outcome: accuracy parameters (multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision)e0
Direction: similare0
Comparator: tilled and no-till soilse0

Verbatim

e0
“The accuracy parameters (multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision) were estimated and in general were similar in the tilled and no-till soils”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–880

t0
“Vegetable”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–17

Title

A Field Vegetable Transplanter for Use in Both Tilled and No-Till Soils

Christian Frasconi; Luisa Martelloni; Michele Raffaelli; et al. Transactions of the ASABE 2019. doi:10.13031/trans.12896

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource A ripper shank opener with straight nose point gave the lowest draft force per unit depth.
Method / resource Transplant success rates were similar in tilled and no-till soils.
Method / resource The transplanter was deemed satisfactory in both tilled and no-till soil.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The metering mechanism gave optimum miss, multiple and quality of feed indices with 84 seed holes at 3 kPa vacuum pressure for 0.83, 1.39 and 1.94 m∙s−1 forward speeds.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: 84 number of seed holes at 3 kPa vacuum pressuree1
Outcome: miss index, multiple index, quality of feed indexe1
Qualifier: for 0.83, 1.39 and 1.94 m∙s−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A planter for planting soybean seeds up to 1.94 m∙s−1 (7 km∙h−1) was designed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77

e1
“The optimum value of different indices i.e., miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index and precision index were observed for 84 number of seed holes at 3 kPa vacuum pressure for 0.83, 1.39 and 1.94 m∙s−1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–767

Title

Development of a Mechanically Assisted Pneumatic Metering Mechanism for High-Speed Planting of Soybean

Manoj Kumar; Ramesh K Sahni; Kamal N Agarwal Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research 2024. doi:10.56042/jsir.v83i1.2863

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resource The metering mechanism gave optimum precision index with 84 seed holes at 3 kPa vacuum pressure for 0.83, 1.39 and 1.94 m∙s−1 forward speeds.
Method / resource Forward speed did not significantly affect the performance indices at 5% confidence level.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the average width of operation of the planter was 2.1 m at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the plant to plant spacing of the planter was 9.7 × 10−2 m at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the depth of operation of the planter was 5.2 × 10−2 m at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the field capacity of the planter was 0.9 ha∙h−1 at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the field efficiency of the planter was 72% at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource The metering mechanism was suitable for planting soybean up to 1.94 m∙s−1 (7 km∙h−1).

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerial imagery overestimated miss index.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
Outcome: miss indexe0
Direction: overestimatede0
Comparator: Aerial imagery data sourcee0

Verbatim

e0
“Aerial imagery data source underestimated quality of feed and precision indices, overestimated miss index”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1251

t0
“Drone Imagery for Monitoring Performance of a Modified Drill”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–75

e1
“no-till corn planter”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–52

Title

Feasibility of Drone Imagery for Monitoring Performance of a Modified Drill in a Conservation Farming System\n\t\t\t\tدوره10 شماره1 سال1399

Kavoosi, Z; Raoufat, M. H Māshīn/hā-yi kishāvarzī/Māshīn/hā-yi kishāvarzī 1397 (?). doi:10.22067/jam.v10i1.71498

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource Images from 10 m altitude gave satisfactory planter assessment results.
Method / resource Aerial and terrestrial seedling spacing measurements correlated with R between 0.94 and 0.98.
Method / resource Aerial imagery underestimated quality of feed and precision indices.
Method / resource Aerial imagery could not supply the data range needed to compute multiple index.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The metering mechanism gave optimum precision index with 84 seed holes at 3 kPa vacuum pressure for 0.83, 1.39 and 1.94 m∙s−1 forward speeds.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: 84 number of seed holes at 3 kPa vacuum pressuree1
Outcome: precision indexe1
Qualifier: for 0.83, 1.39 and 1.94 m∙s−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A planter for planting soybean seeds up to 1.94 m∙s−1 (7 km∙h−1) was designed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77

e1
“The optimum value of different indices i.e., miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index and precision index were observed for 84 number of seed holes at 3 kPa vacuum pressure for 0.83, 1.39 and 1.94 m∙s−1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–767

Title

Development of a Mechanically Assisted Pneumatic Metering Mechanism for High-Speed Planting of Soybean

Manoj Kumar; Ramesh K Sahni; Kamal N Agarwal Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research 2024. doi:10.56042/jsir.v83i1.2863

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resource The metering mechanism gave optimum miss, multiple and quality of feed indices with 84 seed holes at 3 kPa vacuum pressure for 0.83, 1.39 and 1.94 m∙s−1 forward speeds.
Method / resource Forward speed did not significantly affect the performance indices at 5% confidence level.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the average width of operation of the planter was 2.1 m at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the plant to plant spacing of the planter was 9.7 × 10−2 m at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the depth of operation of the planter was 5.2 × 10−2 m at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the field capacity of the planter was 0.9 ha∙h−1 at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource In field evaluation, the field efficiency of the planter was 72% at 1.94 m∙s−1.
Method / resource The metering mechanism was suitable for planting soybean up to 1.94 m∙s−1 (7 km∙h−1).

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“quality of feed and precision indices”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics