Method / resourcemodel-written summary

The corn spacing by depth interaction was not significant for the other planting indices.

A claim from Development and field evaluation of an intercropping machine for corn and bean · 2016

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The corn spacing by depth interaction was not significant for the other planting indices.

Treatment
interactionse0
Outcome
other indicese0
Value
P> 0.05e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the other indices showed no significant interactions (P> 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4188–4250
t0

“corn and bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78

Title

Development and field evaluation of an intercropping machine for corn and bean

A Mondani; S. H Karparvarfard DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.22067/jam.v6i2.40405

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-f9ecf9d81b267a71da392c3f8b967a76cb7c6f8a143d9e3d830b7f882139c36e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer