Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Simanihot provides daily simulations of cassava growth, development and tuberous-root yield with two soil-water options.

Outcome
simulating growth, development and yield of tuberous rootse0
Value
two soil water balance modelse0

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to propose a model, named Simanihot, for simulating growth, development and yield of tuberous roots in cassava, with a choice of two soil water balance models.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–191

Title

SIMANIHOT: A PROCESS-BASED MODEL FOR SIMULATING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY OF CASSAVA

Luana F. Tironi; Nereu A. Streck; Paulo I. Gubiani; et al. Engenharia Agrícola 2017. doi:10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n3p471-483/2017

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuberous-root RNA yield averaged about 79.716 μg /g(FW).

Taxon
Ophiopogon japonicus (L.F.) Ker-GawlOphiopogon japonicust0
Organ / stage
touberous roote0
Outcome
yields of RNA of touberous roote0
Value
79.716e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Average yields of RNA of touberous root and adventitious root were about 79.716 and 76.144 μg /g(FW) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–764
t0

“Ophiopogon japonicus (L.F.) Ker-Gawl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–83

Title

Quick Extraction of Total RNA from the Root of Ophiopogon japonicus (L.F.) Ker-Gawl

Zhou Li 2010

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum and maximum internal efficiencies of N were 35 and 80 kg tuberous root per kg nutrient removed.

Compound
Ne1
Outcome
internal efficiencies of N, P, and Ke1
Value
35 and 80e1

Verbatim

t0

“Modeling the Response of Cassava to Fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47
e1

“Minimum and maximum internal efficiencies of N, P, and K were estimated as 35 and 80 for N, 250 and 750 for P, and 32 and 102 for K (kg tuberous root per kg nutrient removed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–535

Title

Modeling the Response of Cassava to Fertilizers: A Site-Specific Nutrient Management Approach for Greater Tuberous Root Yield

G. Byju; M. Nedunchezhiyan; C. S. Ravindran; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2012. doi:10.1080/00103624.2012.662563

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum and maximum internal efficiencies of P were 250 and 750 kg tuberous root per kg nutrient removed.

Compound
Pe1
Outcome
internal efficiencies of N, P, and Ke1
Value
250 and 750e1

Verbatim

t0

“Modeling the Response of Cassava to Fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47
e1

“Minimum and maximum internal efficiencies of N, P, and K were estimated as 35 and 80 for N, 250 and 750 for P, and 32 and 102 for K (kg tuberous root per kg nutrient removed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–535

Title

Modeling the Response of Cassava to Fertilizers: A Site-Specific Nutrient Management Approach for Greater Tuberous Root Yield

G. Byju; M. Nedunchezhiyan; C. S. Ravindran; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2012. doi:10.1080/00103624.2012.662563

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum and maximum internal efficiencies of K were 32 and 102 kg tuberous root per kg nutrient removed.

Compound
Ke1
Outcome
internal efficiencies of N, P, and Ke1
Value
32 and 102e1

Verbatim

t0

“Modeling the Response of Cassava to Fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47
e1

“Minimum and maximum internal efficiencies of N, P, and K were estimated as 35 and 80 for N, 250 and 750 for P, and 32 and 102 for K (kg tuberous root per kg nutrient removed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–535

Title

Modeling the Response of Cassava to Fertilizers: A Site-Specific Nutrient Management Approach for Greater Tuberous Root Yield

G. Byju; M. Nedunchezhiyan; C. S. Ravindran; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2012. doi:10.1080/00103624.2012.662563

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The QUEFTS model agreed well with measured yields while calibrated.

Outcome
agreement between measured and predicted yieldse3
Qualifier
while calibrating the modele3
Comparator
predicted yieldse3

Verbatim

t0

“Modeling the Response of Cassava to Fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47
e3

“Good agreement between measured and predicted yields was observed while calibrating the model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–982

Title

Modeling the Response of Cassava to Fertilizers: A Site-Specific Nutrient Management Approach for Greater Tuberous Root Yield

G. Byju; M. Nedunchezhiyan; C. S. Ravindran; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2012. doi:10.1080/00103624.2012.662563

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N, P2O5 and K2O estimation guidelines were developed for cassava.

Outcome
guidelines in estimating the fertilizer N, P2O5 and K2Oe0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The guidelines in estimating the fertilizer N, P2O5 and K2O required by cassava based on tuberous root yield response to fertilizer N, P and K and efficiency of fertilizer N, P and K use also were developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1089

Title

Evaluation of fertilizer best management practices by SSNM and customized fertilizers for cassava (Manihot esculenta) cultivation in India

G Byju; M Nedunchezhiyan; James George; et al. Current Horticulture 2020. doi:10.5958/2455-7560.2020.00011.4

Other claims from this paper (11)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.