Claim · model-written summary
Delaying weed removal increased weed biomass by the same magnitude.
Solanum lycopersicumVerbatim
e0“The delay in establishment and removal of weeds resulted in weed biomass decrease and increase of the same magnitude, respectively, regardless of transplant type.”
t0“Tomato”
Title
Critical Period for Weed Control in Grafted and Nongrafted Fresh Market Tomato
Sushila Chaudhari; Katherine M. Jennings; David W. Monks; et al. Weed Science 2016. doi:10.1614/ws-d-15-00049.1
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Association Later weed establishment increased tomato aboveground biomass.
- Association Later weed removal decreased tomato biomass.
- Intervention effect At a given weed timing, grafted tomato produced higher biomass than nongrafted tomato.
- Association Delaying weed establishment decreased weed biomass.
- Method / resource The predicted critical weed-control period for grafted tomato was 2.2 to 4.5 WAT.
- Method / resource The predicted critical weed-control period for nongrafted tomato was 3.3 to 5.8 WAT.
- Intervention effect Grafting did not affect critical-period length of 2.3 or 2.5 weeks.
- Observation Critical-period management began and ended one week earlier for grafted tomato.