View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Manure reduced rye yield variability under Ca and CaPK.
Treatmentadditional manure e0 Outcometemporal yield variability of rye e0 QualifierCa and CaPK (without mineral N) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “additional manure in ‘sub-optimal’ mineral fertilizer treatments, such as Ca and CaPK (without mineral N), reduced the temporal yield variability of rye ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1221 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic input increased rye yield variability under CaNPK and NPK.
Treatmentadditional organic input e0 Outcomevariable rye yields e0 Comparatorthose with no additional manure e0 Verbatim
e0 “additional organic input led to more variable rye yield s in already ‘optimal’ treatments including mineral N (CaNPK and NPK), compared to those with no additional manure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1405 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield was 62% lower in low vigor plots than in high vigor plots.
Directionseverely curtailed e1 Verbatim
t0 “steep Barbera vineyard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 e1 “Final vine size and yield were severely curtailed in LV (−49% and −62% as compared to HV, respectively) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1325 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Topographic attribute inputs reduced RRMSE of the 1D-CNN by about 13%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “predicting within-field soybean yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–246 e4 “The TA-Inputs enhanced accuracy in 1D-CNN (reduced RRMSE by ∼ 13 %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1255 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
A rate of 120 kg N ha−1 was optimal for increasing barley grain yield while meeting malting grain nitrogen requirements.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “120 kg N ha−1 is the optimal rate to increase grain yield while still keeping within the grain N% requirements for malting quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1065 t0 “Spring Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–49 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Earlier dry bean planting increased predicted yield by over 80 percent relative to standard timing.
Treatmentgrowing dry bean earlier e0 Outcomepredicted dry bean yield e0 Comparatorstandard management scenario e0 Verbatim
e0 “growing dry bean earlier than the standard management scenario (December to March) increased predicted dry bean yield by over 80 % with the available water resources and associated temporal variability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1660 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Final vine size was 49% lower in low vigor plots than in high vigor plots.
Directionseverely curtailed e1 Verbatim
t0 “steep Barbera vineyard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 e1 “Final vine size and yield were severely curtailed in LV (−49% and −62% as compared to HV, respectively) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1325 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
A rate of 120 kg N ha−1 kept barley grain nitrogen within malting quality requirements.
Directionkeeping within e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “120 kg N ha−1 is the optimal rate to increase grain yield while still keeping within the grain N% requirements for malting quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1065 t0 “Spring Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–49 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weather inputs reduced RRMSE of the 1D-CNN and LSTM by about 2% when tested across years.
Qualifierwhen tested across-years e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “predicting within-field soybean yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–246 e5 “W-Inputs led to a small improvement in 1D-CNN and LSTM (reduced RRMSE by ∼ 2 %) when tested across-years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1367 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Low vigor plots achieved much better and more complete grape maturity than high vigor plots.
Verbatim
t0 “steep Barbera vineyard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 e1 “Final vine size and yield were severely curtailed in LV (−49% and −62% as compared to HV, respectively) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1325 e2 “which, on the other hand, achieved much better and complete grape maturity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1400 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.