Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging caused wheat relative water content of flag leaf to decrease.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- waterlogginge0
- Outcome
- relative water content of flag leafe0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Results showed waterlogging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined.”
t0“Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Water logging at Booting and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance”
Title
Guangsheng Zhou 中国农业科学(英文版) 2002
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf to increase.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat root vigor to decrease.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat content of chlorophyll to decrease.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat net photosynthesis rate to decrease.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat nitrate reductase activity to decrease.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat content of organic matter to change obviously.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat yield per plant to declined.
- Association Several physiological traits were significantly correlated with wheat waterlogging tolerance.