View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of missing-, multi-, quality - feed and precision indices were 5.14%, 5.833%, 89.03% and 17.85% at L3, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–979 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%.
precision indices e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of missing-, multi-, quality - feed and precision indices were 5.14%, 5.833%, 89.03% and 17.85% at L3, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–979 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%.
quality feed index e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of multi-index 17.59%, 14.44%, 12.40% and 10.18%, quality feed index 74.07%, 75.92%, 75.74% and 74.07% and precision indices 21.47%, 23.26%, 25.51% and 28.53% were at S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1195 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%. Observation At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For corn, seed distance and planting depth significantly affected multiple, miss, quality of feed and precision indices .
different distances between seeds and planting depths e0 multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision index e0 Verbatim
e0 “the different distances between seeds and planting depths were significantly higher for multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision index (P< 0.01) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3943–4111 t0 “corn and bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Transplanter accuracy indices were generally similar in tilled and no-till soils.
accuracy parameters (multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision) e0 tilled and no-till soils e0 Verbatim
e0 “The accuracy parameters (multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision ) were estimated and in general were similar in the tilled and no-till soils ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–880 t0 “Vegetable ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–17 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aerial imagery underestimated quality of feed and precision indices .
quality of feed and precision indices e0 underestimated e0 Aerial imagery data source e0 Verbatim
e0 “Aerial imagery data source underestimated quality of feed and precision indices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1225 t0 “Drone Imagery for Monitoring Performance of a Modified Drill ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–75 e1 “no-till corn planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–52 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aerial imagery overestimated miss index.
Aerial imagery data source e0 Verbatim
e0 “Aerial imagery data source underestimated quality of feed and precision indices , overestimated miss index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1251 t0 “Drone Imagery for Monitoring Performance of a Modified Drill ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–75 e1 “no-till corn planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–52 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Zea mays subsp. mays