Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“dry weight decrease”

10 matchesgrouped into 1 category

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2010

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2247755623 ✕

Intervention effect 10

Show all 10 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato dry shoot weight by 93.58% over untreated check.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: VAM (Glomus fasciculatum) as biofertilizer @ 100 kg/ha + balanced N-P-K fertilizer @ 125-50-100 kg/hae0
Interactor: Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome: dry shoot weighte0
Direction: increasinge0
Value: 93.58%e0
Comparator: untreated checke0

Verbatim

e0
“application of VAM (Glomus fasciculatum) as biofertilizer @ 100 kg/ha + balanced N-P-K fertilizer @ 125-50-100 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the shoot length (52.41%), root length (58.71%), fresh shoot weight (92.09%), fresh root weight (42.42%), dry shoot weight (93.58%), dry root weight (69.2%) with Corresponding decrease in root galls (32.33%), egg masses (10%), final root knot nematode population in soil…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–830

t0
“Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65

Title

Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on Tomato

Tamalika Sarangi; Niranjana Sahoo; S.N. Mahapatra Indian Journal Of Nematology 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect All treatments except the untreated check significantly increased tomato growth parameters.
Intervention effect All treatments except untreated control reduced nematode multiplication.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato shoot length by 52.41% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato root length by 58.71% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato fresh shoot weight by 92.09% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato fresh root weight by 42.42% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato dry root weight by 69.2% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased root galls by 32.33% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased egg masses by 10% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased final root knot nematode population in soil by 73% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased in root by 64.87% over untreated check.
Recommendation The authors propose G. fasciculatum as an option for integrated control of M. incognita on tomato.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato dry root weight by 69.2% over untreated check.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: VAM (Glomus fasciculatum) as biofertilizer @ 100 kg/ha + balanced N-P-K fertilizer @ 125-50-100 kg/hae0
Interactor: Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome: dry root weighte0
Direction: increasinge0
Value: 69.2%e0
Comparator: untreated checke0

Verbatim

e0
“application of VAM (Glomus fasciculatum) as biofertilizer @ 100 kg/ha + balanced N-P-K fertilizer @ 125-50-100 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the shoot length (52.41%), root length (58.71%), fresh shoot weight (92.09%), fresh root weight (42.42%), dry shoot weight (93.58%), dry root weight (69.2%) with Corresponding decrease in root galls (32.33%), egg masses (10%), final root knot nematode population in soil…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–830

t0
“Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65

Title

Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on Tomato

Tamalika Sarangi; Niranjana Sahoo; S.N. Mahapatra Indian Journal Of Nematology 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect All treatments except the untreated check significantly increased tomato growth parameters.
Intervention effect All treatments except untreated control reduced nematode multiplication.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato shoot length by 52.41% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato root length by 58.71% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato fresh shoot weight by 92.09% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato fresh root weight by 42.42% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato dry shoot weight by 93.58% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased root galls by 32.33% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased egg masses by 10% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased final root knot nematode population in soil by 73% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased in root by 64.87% over untreated check.
Recommendation The authors propose G. fasciculatum as an option for integrated control of M. incognita on tomato.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased egg masses by 10% over untreated check.

Taxon: Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0
Treatment: VAM (Glomus fasciculatum) as biofertilizer @ 100 kg/ha + balanced N-P-K fertilizer @ 125-50-100 kg/hae0
Interactor: Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: egg massese0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 10%e0
Comparator: untreated checke0

Verbatim

e0
“application of VAM (Glomus fasciculatum) as biofertilizer @ 100 kg/ha + balanced N-P-K fertilizer @ 125-50-100 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the shoot length (52.41%), root length (58.71%), fresh shoot weight (92.09%), fresh root weight (42.42%), dry shoot weight (93.58%), dry root weight (69.2%) with Corresponding decrease in root galls (32.33%), egg masses (10%), final root knot nematode population in soil…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–830

t0
“Meloidogyne incognita”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55

Title

Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on Tomato

Tamalika Sarangi; Niranjana Sahoo; S.N. Mahapatra Indian Journal Of Nematology 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect All treatments except the untreated check significantly increased tomato growth parameters.
Intervention effect All treatments except untreated control reduced nematode multiplication.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato shoot length by 52.41% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato root length by 58.71% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato fresh shoot weight by 92.09% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato fresh root weight by 42.42% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato dry shoot weight by 93.58% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato dry root weight by 69.2% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased root galls by 32.33% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased final root knot nematode population in soil by 73% over untreated check.
Intervention effect VAM plus balanced N-P-K decreased in root by 64.87% over untreated check.
Recommendation The authors propose G. fasciculatum as an option for integrated control of M. incognita on tomato.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“dry weight decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Intervention effect 10