Intervention effectmodel-written summary

VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato dry shoot weight by 93.58% over untreated check.

A claim from Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on Tomato · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM plus balanced N-P-K increased tomato dry shoot weight by 93.58% over untreated check.

Treatment
VAM (Glomus fasciculatum) as biofertilizer @ 100 kg/ha + balanced N-P-K fertilizer @ 125-50-100 kg/hae0
Interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
dry shoot weighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
93.58%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of VAM (Glomus fasciculatum) as biofertilizer @ 100 kg/ha + balanced N-P-K fertilizer @ 125-50-100 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the shoot length (52.41%), root length (58.71%), fresh shoot weight (92.09%), fresh root weight (42.42%), dry shoot weight (93.58%), dry root weight (69.2%) with Corresponding decrease in root galls (32.33%), egg masses (10%), final root knot nematode population in soil (73%) and in root (64.87%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–830
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65

Title

Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on Tomato

Tamalika Sarangi; Niranjana Sahoo; S.N. Mahapatra Indian Journal Of Nematology 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-707f00a4cd7d557260d0355f920e12f25c71a8a2b6df0eab5aec07b72979b1d8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 127 positive, 17 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

135 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this claim · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

432 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.