Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition

Evaluation of the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) grown in Bangui (Central African Republic) under controlled conditions

H D B Elian; D M Djamndo; G I Touckia; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Valuing mycorrhizae is a potential alternative to the use of fertilizers and phytosanitary products. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) on the growth of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.). The trial was conducted in a greenhouse for 4 months. Inoculation of tomato with the four AMF strains was compared to the control (non-inoculated plant) in a simple randomized design. Height growth of inoculated tomato plants varied among treatments with different strains of AMF. Glomus intraradices resulted in high stem growth (59.12±2.12 cm). The effect of AMF inoculation was significant on the growth of neck diameter of tomato plants. The Glomus fasciculatum strain showed a larger value (13.66±0.82 mm) followed by Glomus mosseae; (12.46±0.20 mm) and Glomus intraradices (11.99±0.42 mm) in diameter. The number of leaves produced per plant differed significantly between plants inoculated with the different strains of AMF and those not inoculated. The average number of leaves (32.2 and 30 leaves/plant) respectively with the plants inoculated with Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices. The best average number of branches (4.33±1.25) was obtained with the Glomus fasciculatum strain. The highest values were obtained with the Glomus aggregatum strain (149.57 g) for total fresh biomass and 36.56 g for total dry biomass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tomato height varied among fungal strains.

Treatment
different strains of AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
Height growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Height growth of inoculated tomato plants varied among treatments with different strains of AMF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–518 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices produced high tomato stem growth of 59.12±2.12 cm.

Treatment
Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
stem growthe0
Direction
highe0
Value
59.12±2.12 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus intraradices resulted in high stem growth (59.12±2.12 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation significantly affected tomato neck diameter.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
growth of neck diametere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of AMF inoculation was significant on the growth of neck diameter of tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus fasciculatum yielded the largest neck diameter, 13.66±0.82 mm.

Treatment
Glomus fasciculatume0
Interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
neck diametere1
Direction
largere0
Value
13.66±0.82 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Glomus fasciculatum strain showed a larger value (13.66±0.82 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“neck diameter of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae yielded 12.46±0.20 mm tomato neck diameter.

Treatment
Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
neck diametere1
Direction
followed bye0
Value
12.46±0.20 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Glomus mosseae; (12.46±0.20 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–792 · show in text ↑
e1

“neck diameter of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices yielded 11.99±0.42 mm tomato neck diameter.

Treatment
Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
neck diametere1
Value
11.99±0.42 mme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus intraradices (11.99±0.42 mm) in diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–844 · show in text ↑
e1

“neck diameter of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato leaf number differed significantly between fungal inoculations and uninoculated plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
different strains of AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
number of leaves produced per plante0
Comparator
those not inoculatede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The number of leaves produced per plant differed significantly between plants inoculated with the different strains of AMF and those not inoculated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae inoculation produced an average of 32.2 tomato leaves per plant.

Treatment
Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
average number of leavese0
Value
32.2e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average number of leaves (32.2 and 30 leaves/plant) respectively with the plants inoculated with Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices inoculation produced an average of 30 tomato leaves per plant.

Treatment
Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
average number of leavese0
Value
30 leaves/plante0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average number of leaves (32.2 and 30 leaves/plant) respectively with the plants inoculated with Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus fasciculatum gave the best average branch number, 4.33±1.25.

Treatment
Glomus fasciculatume0
Interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
average number of branchese0
Direction
beste0
Value
4.33±1.25e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best average number of branches (4.33±1.25) was obtained with the Glomus fasciculatum strain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus aggregatum gave the highest total fresh tomato biomass, 149.57 g.

Treatment
Glomus aggregatume0
Interactor
Glomus aggregatumRhizophagus aggregatuse0symbiont
Outcome
total fresh biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
149.57 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values were obtained with the Glomus aggregatum strain (149.57 g) for total fresh biomass and 36.56 g for total dry biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1370 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus aggregatum gave the highest total dry tomato biomass, 36.56 g.

Treatment
Glomus aggregatume0
Interactor
Glomus aggregatumRhizophagus aggregatuse0symbiont
Outcome
total dry biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
36.56 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values were obtained with the Glomus aggregatum strain (149.57 g) for total fresh biomass and 36.56 g for total dry biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1370 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–236 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Rhizophagus intraradices · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 127 positive, 17 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.