Abstract
An experiment was conducted to study the effect of three fungal biocontrol agents along with G.mosseae and nematicide furfural against root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato plants(Lycopersicon esculentum) under greenhouse condition. Bioagents are Paecilomyces lilacinus, Trichoderma harzianum , T. viride and mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae which were compared with the nematicide furfural . The furfural compound was the best treatment in promoting plant growth and reduction the number of root galls/plant . The result showed that the T. harzianum was the best biocontrol agent in increasing shoot length and root length 16.2 % , 26.1% respectively .The P. lilacinus was the best biocontrol agent in reduction root galling (57.53%). Combination of biocotrol agents with G. mosseae and furfural was the least effective treatment in promoting plant growth and the reduction of root galling was 31.43%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Furfural was the best treatment for promoting tomato plant growth compared with the biocontrol agents.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- furfurale1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
- Outcome
- plant growthe1
- Direction
- beste1
- Comparator
- Bioagentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato plants”
e1“The furfural compound was the best treatment in promoting plant growth and reduction the number of root galls/plant”
e2“Bioagents are Paecilomyces lilacinus, Trichoderma harzianum , T. viride and mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae which were compared with the nematicide furfural”
Claim · model-written summary
Furfural reduced the number of root galls per tomato plant compared with the biocontrol agents.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- furfurale1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
- Outcome
- number of root galls/plante1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Comparator
- Bioagentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato plants”
e1“The furfural compound was the best treatment in promoting plant growth and reduction the number of root galls/plant”
e2“Bioagents are Paecilomyces lilacinus, Trichoderma harzianum , T. viride and mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae which were compared with the nematicide furfural”
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma harzianum increased tomato shoot length by 16.2% compared with the other biocontrol agents.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- T. harzianume3
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
- Second interactor
- T. harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume3biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- shoot lengthe3
- Direction
- increasinge3
- Value
- 16.2 %e3
- Comparator
- Bioagentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato plants”
e2“Bioagents are Paecilomyces lilacinus, Trichoderma harzianum , T. viride and mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae which were compared with the nematicide furfural”
e3“The result showed that the T. harzianum was the best biocontrol agent in increasing shoot length and root length 16.2 % , 26.1% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma harzianum increased tomato root length by 26.1% compared with the other biocontrol agents.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- T. harzianume3
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
- Second interactor
- T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume3biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root lengthe3
- Direction
- increasinge3
- Value
- 26.1%e3
- Comparator
- Bioagentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato plants”
e2“Bioagents are Paecilomyces lilacinus, Trichoderma harzianum , T. viride and mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae which were compared with the nematicide furfural”
e3“The result showed that the T. harzianum was the best biocontrol agent in increasing shoot length and root length 16.2 % , 26.1% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces lilacinus was the best biocontrol agent for reducing tomato root galling by 57.53%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- P. lilacinuse4
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
- Second interactor
- P. lilacinus
Purpureocillium lilacinume4biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- root gallinge4
- Direction
- reductione4
- Value
- 57.53%e4
- Comparator
- Bioagentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato plants”
e2“Bioagents are Paecilomyces lilacinus, Trichoderma harzianum , T. viride and mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae which were compared with the nematicide furfural”
e4“The P. lilacinus was the best biocontrol agent in reduction root galling (57.53%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of biocontrol agents with G. mosseae and furfural was the least effective treatment for tomato plant growth.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Combination of biocotrol agents with G. mosseae and furfurale5
- Interactor
- G. mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee5symbiont - Outcome
- promoting plant growthe5
- Direction
- least effectivee5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato plants”
e5“Combination of biocotrol agents with G. mosseae and furfural was the least effective treatment in promoting plant growth and the reduction of root galling was 31.43%”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of biocontrol agents with G. mosseae and furfural reduced tomato root galling by 31.43%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Combination of biocotrol agents with G. mosseae and furfurale5
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
- Second interactor
- G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee5symbiont
- Outcome
- the reduction of root gallinge5
- Direction
- reductione5
- Value
- 31.43%e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato plants”
e5“Combination of biocotrol agents with G. mosseae and furfural was the least effective treatment in promoting plant growth and the reduction of root galling was 31.43%”
The same questions in other papers
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
16 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →furfural · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Funneliformis mosseae · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Trichoderma harzianum · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.