Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhiza affected neither leaf area nor root weight or length.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Mycorrhizae0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- leaf area nor root weight or lengthe0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhiza neither affected leaf area nor root weight or length”
t0“Tomato”
Title
Michael Bitterlich; Martin Sandmann; Jan Graefe Frontiers in Plant Science 2018. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00154
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Inoculation with AMF did not affect substrate porosity or saturated water contents in tomato.
- Intervention effect Substrate porosity and saturated water contents declined after the substrates dried.
- Intervention effect Drying caused a decline in pot water capacity and hydraulic conductivity.
- Intervention effect Plant available water contents under wet (pF 1.8-4.2) and dry (pF 2.5-4.2) conditions increased in mycorrhizal substrates and were conserved after drying.
- Intervention effect Substrate hydraulic conductivity was higher in mycorrhizal pots before and during drought exposure.
- Intervention effect After water was withheld, substrate drying rates were higher in mycorrhizal substrates.
- Intervention effect After water was withheld, substrate water potentials were lower in mycorrhizal substrates.
- Intervention effect AMF restored the plant hydraulic status.
- Intervention effect AMF increased plant transpiration when soil moisture declined.
- Intervention effect The water potential at the root surface and the resistance to water flow in the rhizosphere were restored in mycorrhizal pots although the bulk substrate dried more.
- Intervention effect Substrates colonized by AMF can be more desiccated before substrate water flux quantitatively limits transpiration, most pronounced under high transpiration demands, with a difference of over 1000 hPa in substrate water potential.