Claim · model-written summary
No interspecific transgenic hybrids of creeping bentgrass were recovered with A gigantea or A canina.
- Taxon
- creeping bentgrass
Agrostis stoloniferae3 - Interactor
- A gigantea
Agrostis giganteae2other - Second interactor
- A canina
Agrostis caninae2other - Outcome
- interspecific transgenic hybridse2
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e2“No interspecific transgenic hybrids were recovered with A gigantea or A canina”
e3“In a field study we have measured the frequency of interspecific hybridization between transgenic creeping bentgrass and four related species”
Title
Interspecific Hybridization between and Related Species under Field Conditions
F. C. Belanger; T. R. Meagher; P. R. Day; et al. Crop Science 2003. doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.0240
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Observation Transgenic creeping bentgrass produced interspecific hybrids with A capillaris at 0.044% in a field study.
- Observation Transgenic creeping bentgrass produced interspecific hybrids with A castellana at 0.0015% in a field study.
- Observation Intraspecific transgenic progeny recovery of creeping bentgrass in the same experimental plots was 0.631%.
- Association Interspecific transgenic hybrid recovery was considerably lower than intraspecific transgenic progeny recovery in creeping bentgrass.