Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in A”

15 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2010

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2905239081 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced leaf starch.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: wSe1
Outcome: starch content in leavese0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“leading to a reduced starch content in leaves”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–974

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: eTe1
Outcome: starch, CP and digestibilitye0
Direction: reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“reducing starch, CP and digestibility”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1340

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: wSeT treatmente0
Outcome: forage qualitye0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The combined wSeT treatment reduced A , g s , V cmax and the forage quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1417

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming increased lignin content.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: eTe1
Outcome: lignin contente0
Direction: increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“reduced the forage quality, increasing the lignin content and reducing starch, CP and digestibility”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1340

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: wSeT treatmente0
Outcome: A , g s , V cmaxe0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The combined wSeT treatment reduced A , g s , V cmax and the forage quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1417

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased forage fiber.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: wSe0
Outcome: fiberse0
Direction: increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“reduction in forage quality by increasing fibers, reducing crude protein (CP) and decreasing the IVDMD was also observed by effect of wS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1155

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: Warming under adequate soil moisture ( eT )e0
Outcome: LDMe0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Warming under adequate soil moisture ( eT ) significantly increased LDM by 25%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1236

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: wSe0
Outcome: IVDMDe0
Direction: decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“reduction in forage quality by increasing fibers, reducing crude protein (CP) and decreasing the IVDMD was also observed by effect of wS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1155

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced crude protein.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: wSe0
Outcome: crude protein (CP)e0
Direction: reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“reduction in forage quality by increasing fibers, reducing crude protein (CP) and decreasing the IVDMD was also observed by effect of wS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1155

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: wS and eT treatmentse0
Outcome: photosystem II photochemistrye0
Direction: no effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–762

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in A”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics