Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in density”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 2 non-evaluative

Over time

2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: tree ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing tree density reduced fodder tree yield.

Taxon: treee0
Treatment: Decrease in tree densitye0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Decrease in tree density (low population) resulted in reduced yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1034

Title

On-farm productivity ofAcacia angustissima, Calliandra calothyrsusandLeucaena leucocephalain a subhumid area in Zimbabwe

I Matimati; B V Maasdorp; L Hove African Journal of Range and Forage Science 2009. doi:10.2989/ajrfs.2009.26.2.4.847

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting plus planting most decreased climber density.

Taxon: treet0
Treatment: cutting + plantinge0
Interactor: climberse0other
Outcome: density and basal area of climberse0
Direction: highest decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“cutting + planting resulted in the highest decrease in the density and basal area of climbers longer than 1 m”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–795

t0
“Tree”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34

Title

Combining Climber Cutting and Tree Seedling Planting Improves Structural Attributes of a Seasonal Semideciduous Forest in Southeastern Brazil

Guilherme Aparecido Melo dos Santos; Valéria Forni Martins; Ana Carolina Cardoso de Oliveira; et al. Biotropica 2025. doi:10.1111/btp.70023

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Cutting plus planting most decreased climber basal area.
Intervention effect Cutting plus planting most increased large living tree density.
Intervention effect Both strategies reduced large dead tree percentage, with cutting having the greater effect.
Intervention effect Cutting plus planting increased tree sapling richness.
Intervention effect Management did not affect large living tree basal area.
Intervention effect Management did not affect tree sapling density.
Recommendation The authors advocate cutting plus planting as the best tested restoration strategy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Higher agroforestry tree density was associated with up to 25% (±17) less soil erosion.

Taxon: Treet0
Treatment: increase in agroforestry tree densitye0
Outcome: soil erosione0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 25% (±17)e0
Comparator: arable or pure-pasture alternativee0

Verbatim

t0
“Tree Densities”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71

e0
“from an arable or pure-pasture alternative starting point, an increase in agroforestry tree density could also be associated with a decrease in soil erosion of up to 25% (±17), a decrease in nitrates leached of up to 52% (±34) and an increase in the carbon sequestered of 163 Mg C ha−1 (±128) while at the same time ensuring the same levels of biomass growth and an increase in product diversification.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–2089

Title

Quantifying Regulating Ecosystem Services with Increased Tree Densities on European Farmland

Josep Crous-Duran; Anil R. Graves; Silvestre García de Jalón; et al. Sustainability 2020. doi:10.3390/su12166676

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Forestry alternatives decreased soil erosion by 51% (±29).
Intervention effect Forestry alternatives decreased nitrate leaching by 98% ± 1.
Intervention effect Forestry alternatives increased carbon sequestration by up to 238 Mg C ha−1 (±140).
Intervention effect Higher agroforestry tree density was associated with up to 52% (±34) less nitrate leaching.
Intervention effect Higher agroforestry tree density was associated with 163 Mg C ha−1 (±128) more carbon sequestration.
Association Higher agroforestry tree density maintained biomass growth.
Association Higher agroforestry tree density increased product diversification.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Higher agroforestry tree density was associated with up to 52% (±34) less nitrate leaching.

Taxon: Treet0
Treatment: increase in agroforestry tree densitye0
Outcome: nitrates leachede0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 52% (±34)e0
Comparator: arable or pure-pasture alternativee0

Verbatim

t0
“Tree Densities”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71

e0
“from an arable or pure-pasture alternative starting point, an increase in agroforestry tree density could also be associated with a decrease in soil erosion of up to 25% (±17), a decrease in nitrates leached of up to 52% (±34) and an increase in the carbon sequestered of 163 Mg C ha−1 (±128) while at the same time ensuring the same levels of biomass growth and an increase in product diversification.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–2089

Title

Quantifying Regulating Ecosystem Services with Increased Tree Densities on European Farmland

Josep Crous-Duran; Anil R. Graves; Silvestre García de Jalón; et al. Sustainability 2020. doi:10.3390/su12166676

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Forestry alternatives decreased soil erosion by 51% (±29).
Intervention effect Forestry alternatives decreased nitrate leaching by 98% ± 1.
Intervention effect Forestry alternatives increased carbon sequestration by up to 238 Mg C ha−1 (±140).
Intervention effect Higher agroforestry tree density was associated with up to 25% (±17) less soil erosion.
Intervention effect Higher agroforestry tree density was associated with 163 Mg C ha−1 (±128) more carbon sequestration.
Association Higher agroforestry tree density maintained biomass growth.
Association Higher agroforestry tree density increased product diversification.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Higher agroforestry tree density was associated with 163 Mg C ha−1 (±128) more carbon sequestration.

Taxon: Treet0
Treatment: increase in agroforestry tree densitye0
Outcome: carbon sequesterede0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 163 Mg C ha−1 (±128)e0
Comparator: arable or pure-pasture alternativee0

Verbatim

t0
“Tree Densities”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71

e0
“from an arable or pure-pasture alternative starting point, an increase in agroforestry tree density could also be associated with a decrease in soil erosion of up to 25% (±17), a decrease in nitrates leached of up to 52% (±34) and an increase in the carbon sequestered of 163 Mg C ha−1 (±128) while at the same time ensuring the same levels of biomass growth and an increase in product diversification.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–2089

Title

Quantifying Regulating Ecosystem Services with Increased Tree Densities on European Farmland

Josep Crous-Duran; Anil R. Graves; Silvestre García de Jalón; et al. Sustainability 2020. doi:10.3390/su12166676

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Forestry alternatives decreased soil erosion by 51% (±29).
Intervention effect Forestry alternatives decreased nitrate leaching by 98% ± 1.
Intervention effect Forestry alternatives increased carbon sequestration by up to 238 Mg C ha−1 (±140).
Intervention effect Higher agroforestry tree density was associated with up to 25% (±17) less soil erosion.
Intervention effect Higher agroforestry tree density was associated with up to 52% (±34) less nitrate leaching.
Association Higher agroforestry tree density maintained biomass growth.
Association Higher agroforestry tree density increased product diversification.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting plus planting most decreased climber basal area.

Taxon: Treet0
Treatment: cutting + plantinge0
Interactor: climberse0other
Outcome: basal area of climberse0
Direction: highest decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“cutting + planting resulted in the highest decrease in the density and basal area of climbers longer than 1 m”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–795

t0
“Tree”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34

Title

Combining Climber Cutting and Tree Seedling Planting Improves Structural Attributes of a Seasonal Semideciduous Forest in Southeastern Brazil

Guilherme Aparecido Melo dos Santos; Valéria Forni Martins; Ana Carolina Cardoso de Oliveira; et al. Biotropica 2025. doi:10.1111/btp.70023

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Cutting plus planting most decreased climber density.
Intervention effect Cutting plus planting most increased large living tree density.
Intervention effect Both strategies reduced large dead tree percentage, with cutting having the greater effect.
Intervention effect Cutting plus planting increased tree sapling richness.
Intervention effect Management did not affect large living tree basal area.
Intervention effect Management did not affect tree sapling density.
Recommendation The authors advocate cutting plus planting as the best tested restoration strategy.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in density”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics