View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease .
Outcomeappropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yield s as well as yield safety for the future. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.
Qualifierfor every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) e0 Verbatim
e0 “declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723 e1 “yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg overestimated yield decrease when relative evapotranspiration exceeded 0.8.
Outcomeoverestimates its value e0 Qualifierrelative evapotranspiration is above 0.8 e0 Verbatim
e0 “however it overestimates its value when the relative evapotranspiration is above 0.8. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1115 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The polynomial model could not calculate a salinity yield decrease value.
Taxonvegetables, and ornamentals e1 Outcomecalculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible e0 Comparatorpolynomial model e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The polynomial model has the drawback that calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–790 e1 “various vegetables, and ornamentals were grown in a substrate system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–163 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Goodness of fit of relative yield decrease with mean CWSI was r 2 = 0.78 for the combined plantings.
Outcomerelative Y decrease with mean CWSI e5 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 e5 “for relative Y decrease with mean CWSI, r 2 = 0.78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1467 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
EPIC projected a corn yield decrease under the coarse scenario.
Comparatorcoarse scenario e0 Not reported Outcome Value
Verbatim
e0 “EPIC simulated a decrease for the coarse scenario but no change for the fine scale scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–659 t0 “for wheat and corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–79 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
The controller caused no significant decrease in simulated maize yield relative to constant irrigation.
Directionwithout any significant decrease e0 Comparatorconstant irrigation method of the DSSAT model e0 Verbatim
t0 “Precision Irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 e0 “almost 40% decrease in water consumption is achieved in comparison to constant irrigation method of the DSSAT model without any significant decrease in yield and leaf area index. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2249–2427 e1 “DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer) maize crop simulation model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–1999 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
No nitrogen application decrease d simulated yield by 8%.
Treatmentno N is applied e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “8% yield decrease when no N is applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3036–3074 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sesame seed yield began to decrease at a plant water stress index of 0.31.
Outcomethreshold plant water stress index value e0 Verbatim
e0 “the threshold plant water stress index value, where sesame seed yield starts to decrease , was calculated as 0.31 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1680 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.