Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Outcome
appropriate to estimate the grain yield decreasee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028
t0

“WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78

Title

WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST

CLÍSTENES ANTÔNIO GUADAGNIN; EDGAR RICARDO SCHOFFEL; HELVIO DEBLI CASALINHO; et al. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo 2017. doi:10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v16n1p61-71

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
yield safetye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yields as well as yield safety for the future.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025

Title

USING LONG-TERM FIELD EXPERIMENT DATA TO PREPARE A CROP SIMULATION MODEL FOR CLIMATE IMPACT STUDIES

GY. MICSKEI Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2016. doi:10.15666/aeer/1403_263280

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.

Outcome
yielde1
Direction
declinede0
Value
2%e0
Qualifier
for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites)e0

Verbatim

e0

“declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723
e1

“yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8

Title

A potato model intercomparison across varying climates and productivity levels

David H. Fleisher; Bruno Condori; Roberto Quiroz; et al. Global Change Biology 2016. doi:10.1111/gcb.13411

Other claims from this paper (16)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Isareg overestimated yield decrease when relative evapotranspiration exceeded 0.8.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Outcome
overestimates its valuee0
Value
0.8e0
Qualifier
relative evapotranspiration is above 0.8e0

Verbatim

e0

“however it overestimates its value when the relative evapotranspiration is above 0.8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1115
t0

“WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78

Title

WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST

CLÍSTENES ANTÔNIO GUADAGNIN; EDGAR RICARDO SCHOFFEL; HELVIO DEBLI CASALINHO; et al. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo 2017. doi:10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v16n1p61-71

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The polynomial model could not calculate a salinity yield decrease value.

Taxon
vegetables, and ornamentalse1
Outcome
calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possiblee0
Comparator
polynomial modele0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The polynomial model has the drawback that calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–790
e1

“various vegetables, and ornamentals were grown in a substrate system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–163

Title

Modeling Osmotic Salinity Effects on Yield Characteristics of Substrate-Grown Greenhouse Crops

C. Sonneveld; A. L. van den Bos; W. Voogt Journal of Plant Nutrition 2004. doi:10.1081/lpla-200030053

Other claims from this paper (8)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goodness of fit of relative yield decrease with mean CWSI was r 2 = 0.78 for the combined plantings.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
relative Y decrease with mean CWSIe5
Value
r 2 = 0.78e5

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55
e5

“for relative Y decrease with mean CWSI, r 2 = 0.78”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1467

Title

Evapotranspiration and Yield Estimation of Spring Wheat from Canopy Temperature1

R. A. Diaz; A. D. Matthias; R. J. Hanks Agronomy Journal 1983. doi:10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500050018x

Other claims from this paper (8)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

EPIC projected a corn yield decrease under the coarse scenario.

Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
coarse scenarioe0

Not reportedOutcomeValue

Verbatim

e0

“EPIC simulated a decrease for the coarse scenario but no change for the fine scale scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–659
t0

“for wheat and corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–79

Title

Comparative responses of EPIC and CERES crop models to high and low spatial resolution climate change scenarios

L. O. Mearns; T. Mavromatis; E. Tsvetsinskaya; et al. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 1999. doi:10.1029/1998jd200061

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

The controller caused no significant decrease in simulated maize yield relative to constant irrigation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without any significant decreasee0
Comparator
constant irrigation method of the DSSAT modele0

Verbatim

t0

“Precision Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64
e0

“almost 40% decrease in water consumption is achieved in comparison to constant irrigation method of the DSSAT model without any significant decrease in yield and leaf area index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2249–2427
e1

“DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer) maize crop simulation model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–1999

Title

Reinforcement Learning Based Controller For Precision Irrigation

Shivaram Irukula OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) 2015

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

No nitrogen application decreased simulated yield by 8%.

Treatment
no N is appliede0
Outcome
yield decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“8% yield decrease when no N is applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3036–3074

Title

Targeting the right input data to improve crop modeling at global level : [ePoster abstract Gc13B-1085]

Myriam Adam; Richard Robertson; Sika Gbegbelegbe; et al. Agritrop (Cirad) 2012

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame seed yield began to decrease at a plant water stress index of 0.31.

Outcome
threshold plant water stress index valuee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.31e0

Verbatim

e0

“the threshold plant water stress index value, where sesame seed yield starts to decrease, was calculated as 0.31”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1680

Title

Determination of Irrigation Time by Utilizing Plant Water Stress Index (CWSI) Values of II. Crop Sesame Genotype in Siirt Conditions

UÇAK, Ali Beyhan; ARSLAN, Hüseyin; ÖZÇINAR, Aynur Bilmez; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5921767

Other claims from this paper (11)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.