Claim · model-written summary
CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Glycine maxVerbatim
e0“The results indicated an average decrease of 40.4% in root fresh weight, of 70.2% in root dry weight, of 68.1% in shoot fresh weight, of 80.1% in shoot dry weight, and of 83.3% in maximum root length in CSPS compared to ESPS.”
t0“Soybean”
Title
Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits
Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
- Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
- Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
- Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
- Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.