Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings suppressed increasing soybean seed water content relative to control.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: coating treatmente0
Outcome: water contente0
Direction: suppressthe increasee0
Qualifier: during storagee1
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“coating treatment could significantly suppressthe increase in water content and the decrease in protein and fat levels compared to the control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–896

t0
“seed soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69

e1
“Two varietiesof soybean seed and three coating treatments (control, CS, and CSNPs) were used during storage for six months.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–645

Title

Effects of chitosan nanoparticles coating on delaying of seed soybean (Gycine max) deterioration

Abdullah Bin Arif; Sri Yuliani,; Qanytah Hernani; et al. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 2023. doi:10.9755/ejfa.2023.v35.i3.2982

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Coatings suppressed the decline in soybean seed protein and fat levels.
Intervention effect Coatings suppressed respiration rate, ethylene content, and MDA concentration in soybean seeds, especially Grobogan.
Intervention effect Coated soybean seed had a higher vigor index and germination than controls, especially Dega.
Intervention effect CSNPs outperformed CS and control across all experimental parameters.
Intervention effect Dega seed germination after six months of CS coating was 93.33%.
Intervention effect Dega seed germination after six months of CSNPs coating was 92.67%.
Association Initial moisture content strongly affected soybean seed physical and chemical properties and viability in storage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic potential increased to 0.716 under 60% of field capacity irrigation.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: water deficite0
Outcome: osmotic potentiale3
Direction: increasee3
Value: 0.716e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“soybean (Glycine max merri.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109

e0
“There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755

e3
“While osmotic potential increase to 0.716 and 0.647”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–969

Title

The effect of Water limitation on Water Relations, growth and seed yield of four soybean (Glycine max merri.) genotypes

Kamil M. Al; Abdurrahman Salim 2014

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Leaf relative water content fell to 74.6% under 60% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
Intervention effect Leaf relative water content fell to 60.6% under 50% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
Intervention effect Osmotic potential increased to 0.647 under 50% of field capacity irrigation.
Association Genotype interacted significantly with water level for osmotic potential but not for relative water content.
Intervention effect Drought stress did not significantly affect Ca and K uptake in soybean.
Association Genotype Pi took up more K (466.2 m mole Kg-1) than the other genotypes.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced dry matter accumulation of soybean.
Intervention effect Water limitation reduced pods per plant and 1000-seed weight of soybean.
Intervention effect Seed yield per plant under limited irrigation was lower than under well-watering.
Association Lee had the highest dry matter (8.9 g).
Association Lee had the highest number of pods per plant (81.84).
Association Lee had the highest 1000-seed weight (15.2 g).
Mechanism The higher plant seed yield of Lee (2.613 g) is attributed to its higher pods per plant and 1000-seed weight.
Observation Genotype S consumed 1199.9 mm of water under irrigation.
Observation Genotype Lee consumed 1158.5 mm of water under irrigation.
Observation Genotype Pi consumed a low amount of water (876.5 mm).
Observation Genotype G consumed a low amount of water (892.7 mm).
Recommendation Genotypes Pi and G may be used in less moisture conditions.
Mechanism Osmotic adjustment may be the adaptive mechanism that lets soybean survive drought.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic potential increased to 0.647 under 50% of field capacity irrigation.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: water deficite0
Outcome: osmotic potentiale3
Direction: increasee3
Value: 0.647e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“soybean (Glycine max merri.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109

e0
“There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755

e3
“While osmotic potential increase to 0.716 and 0.647”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–969

Title

The effect of Water limitation on Water Relations, growth and seed yield of four soybean (Glycine max merri.) genotypes

Kamil M. Al; Abdurrahman Salim 2014

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Leaf relative water content fell to 74.6% under 60% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
Intervention effect Leaf relative water content fell to 60.6% under 50% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
Intervention effect Osmotic potential increased to 0.716 under 60% of field capacity irrigation.
Association Genotype interacted significantly with water level for osmotic potential but not for relative water content.
Intervention effect Drought stress did not significantly affect Ca and K uptake in soybean.
Association Genotype Pi took up more K (466.2 m mole Kg-1) than the other genotypes.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced dry matter accumulation of soybean.
Intervention effect Water limitation reduced pods per plant and 1000-seed weight of soybean.
Intervention effect Seed yield per plant under limited irrigation was lower than under well-watering.
Association Lee had the highest dry matter (8.9 g).
Association Lee had the highest number of pods per plant (81.84).
Association Lee had the highest 1000-seed weight (15.2 g).
Mechanism The higher plant seed yield of Lee (2.613 g) is attributed to its higher pods per plant and 1000-seed weight.
Observation Genotype S consumed 1199.9 mm of water under irrigation.
Observation Genotype Lee consumed 1158.5 mm of water under irrigation.
Observation Genotype Pi consumed a low amount of water (876.5 mm).
Observation Genotype G consumed a low amount of water (892.7 mm).
Recommendation Genotypes Pi and G may be used in less moisture conditions.
Mechanism Osmotic adjustment may be the adaptive mechanism that lets soybean survive drought.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza and cattle manure application improved electrolyte leakage in water-stressed soybean.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: mycorrhiza and cattle manure applicatione3
Outcome: electrolyte leakagee3
Direction: decreaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“physiological and biochemical changes in soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–103

e3
“By contrast, mycorrhiza and cattle manure application had positive effect on relative water content and improve of electrolyte leakage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1037

Title

Effect of cattle manure and mycorrhiza applications on physiological and biochemical changes in soybean [ Glycine max check for this species in other resources (L.) Merr.] grown under water deficit stress

Amin Taherianfar; Hamid Reza Tohidi Moghadam; Hossein Zahedi Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) 2013

Other claims from this paper (6)

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics