Claim · model-written summary
Pod removal did not affect plant weight increment in the wild soybean variety, owing to leaf and stem compensation.
- Taxon
- wild soybean
Glycine sojae0 - Treatment
- Pod removale1
- Outcome
- plant weight incremente0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Qualifier
- large compensatory increase of leaf and stem weighte0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“did not affect plant weight increment in the wild soybean variety due to the large compensatory increase of leaf and stem weight”
e1“Pod removal which resulted in the decrease of plant weight increment in the cultivar Tamahomare”
t0“soybean”
Title
Kounosuke Fujita; Taizo Masuda; Shoitsu Ogata Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 1988. doi:10.1080/00380768.1988.10415680
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Control soybean cultivars gained markedly in total dry weight because pod weight increased.
- Observation The wild soybean variety had a lower total dry weight increase.
- Intervention effect Pod removal decreased plant weight increment in Tamahomare.
- Intervention effect Pod removal markedly decreased dinitrogen fixation in Tamahomare.
- Intervention effect Pod removal caused a slight, significant, short-lived decrease in Harosoy dinitrogen fixation.
- Intervention effect Control and depodded wild soybean plants did not differ distinctly in fixation activity.
- Intervention effect Pod removal decreased fixed-N increment in Tamahomare.
- Intervention effect Pod removal slightly decreased fixed-N increment in Harosoy.
- Intervention effect Pod removal had no effect on fixed-N increment in Nakei-No. 1, with compensation in stems, petioles and roots.
- Association The effect of pod removal on fixation varied among cultivars and depended on growth habit.