View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Al-gaimi root dry weight did not decrease under mild deficit.
Mild water deficit e0 neither decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mild water deficit affected Sindy-2 and Hab-Ahmar, while Al-gaimi was less affected with neither decrease in root dry weight nor change in dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–913 t0 “wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In the fertilized pole-stage stand, needle dry weight of Scots pine did not decrease at senescence four years after fertilization.
needle dry weight e5 did not decrease e5 pole-stage stand e5 Verbatim
e0 “Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–140 e5 “In the fertilized, pole-stage stand, needle dry weight did not decrease at senescence four years after fertilization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–723 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
After 50 days of NaCl stress, dry matter weight did not decrease with salt concentration.
dry matter weight e0 no decrease trend e0 Verbatim
e0 “in 50 days after NaCl stress,the dry matter weight and the leaf number showed no decrease trend along with increase of salt concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–494 t0 “Haloxylon ammodendron Seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–110 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorflurenol did not significantly decrease plant fresh and dry weight .
this morphactin e0 fresh and dry weights e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “However, this morphactin did not significantly decrease the fresh and dry weight s of plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–421 t0 “TOURNESOL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Spurred anoda interference did not decrease cotton branch dry weight in ultra narrow rows.
Spurred anoda interference e0 Spurred anoda e0 weed cotton branch dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Spurred anoda interference resulted in a decrease in cotton branch dry weight in WR but not in UNR. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1069 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
P. vaginatum shoot and root dry weight did not significantly decrease at 72 dS m-1.
shoot and root dry weight e0 did not show significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “P. vaginatum and E. atrovirens did not show significant decrease in shoot and root dry weight at highest salinity levels (72 dS m-1). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1081 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight .
>95% relative humidity e1 growth (fresh weight and dry weight) e0 neither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Anaerobiosis did not affect dry weight loss in seedlings younger than two days.
younger than 2 days e0 anaerobic treatment e0 rate of dry weight decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In seedlings younger than 2 days the rate of dry weight decrease was not affected by the anaerobic treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–653 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Four kg/ha in individual zones did not decrease English pea height or dry weight .
4 kg/ha in only the shoot, seed, or root zones e0 seedling height or dry weight e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Application of 4 kg/ha in only the shoot, seed, or root zones of English pea did not decrease seedling height or dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1666 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, metolachlor reduced germination by less than 10% in corn, English pea and sicklepod. Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, metolachlor reduced wheat germination by less than 10%. Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, oat germination fell to 0. Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, lettuce germination fell to 11%. Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, peanut germination fell to 14%. Intervention effect A 10 -6 M metolachlor concentration did not affect germination of tested species. Intervention effect A 10 -5 M concentration did not significantly decrease corn, morningglory or wheat root length and fresh weight. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, metolachlor adversely affected other tested species. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, English pea root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, cucumber root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, radish root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, sicklepod root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, soybean root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect One kg/ha in the shoot zone significantly reduced barley seedling height and dry weight. Intervention effect One kg/ha in the shoot zone significantly reduced corn seedling height and dry weight. Intervention effect Shoot-zone treatment was ineffective in the seed or root zone, while all-zone treatment was about twice as detrimental. Intervention effect Four kg/ha in all zones decreased English pea seedling height and dry weight about 98%. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, metolachlor decreased leucine uptake in cucumber root tips but not incorporation into protein. Intervention effect At 10 -4 M, metolachlor strongly reduced leucine uptake and slightly decreased incorporation into protein. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
More shade did not decrease final dry weight for Yours Truly.
shade increased e0 final dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “As shade increased, final dry weight decrease d for ‘Sooner Red’ but not for ‘Yours Truly’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1265 t0 “Geraniums ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Pinus sylvestris
Haloxylon ammodendron
Gossypium hirsutum
Paspalum vaginatum
Zea mays
Geranium