View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W1646055588 ✕
Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spatial variability was below temporal variability and frequently below 1 mm.
Spatial variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Spatial variability was less than temporal variability , and frequently less than 1 mm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1319 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal precipitation variability was 0.17 to 3.40 mm·day−1.
Median absolute deviation from a reference year e0 0.17 to 3.40 mm·day−1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Median absolute deviation from a reference year was 0.17 to 3.40 mm·day−1 ( temporal /year-to-year variability ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1232 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated yield differed from the long term mean by 21.5%.
percent absolute difference from long-term mean e0 Verbatim
e0 “The percent absolute difference from long-term mean ( temporal variability ) was 21.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1814 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Farm scale yield error was 10.9%.
Verbatim
e0 “10.9% farm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–835 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
County scale yield error was 10.5%.
Verbatim
e0 “10.5% county ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–849 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
State scale yield error was 7.9%.
Verbatim
e0 “7.9% state yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–867 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated corn yield differed by 15.8% across precipitation sources.
percent absolute difference of simulated yield among the three sources e0 Verbatim
e0 “The percent absolute difference of simulated yield among the three sources (effect of spatial precipitation variability ) was 15.8% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1728 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
The most profitable nitrogen strategy did not depend on precipitation data source.
most profitable strategy e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most profitable strategy was not dependent on the data source ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2171 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spatial precipitation variability among farm gauges was 0.25 to 1.73 mm·day−1.
median absolute deviation of precipitation among gauges e0 0.25 to 1.73 mm·day−1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “median absolute deviation of precipitation among gauges, by corn and soybean phenological phase, of 0.25 to 1.73 mm·day−1 (spatial variability ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1121 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Using the nearest NWS station was more profitable than measuring precipitation on site.
more profitable e0 measuring precipitation on-site e0 Verbatim
e0 “Using data from the nearest NWS station was more profitable than measuring precipitation on-site ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2173–2269 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mayse1